In his speech, Trump refers to the WTC collapse as an "IMPLOSION"
(www.youtube.com)
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Cuz thats exactly what it was. Anybody with half a brain knows that a building does not just fall neatly into its own footprint unless its being demolished.
If the jet fuel narrative was true. You would have seen the tops of the buildings above the impacts start leaning over as the structure weakened.possibly even break off and free fall to the ground. Sure as fuck wouldn't have fallen straight down into neat pile.
How does the fuel burn a steel building but no worries if it burns for hours in a jet engine. The steel in a building gbis gonna be pretty dam strong compared to a jet engine.
Unless you have cut,welded,formed or otherwise worked with metals with your own hands,you wouldn't understand how it actually works. How does a car engine run without melting the cast aluminum pistons?
I work with metals and engines.
The parts inside a jet engine are not made from common steel. If I remember correctly,the fins on the blades are made of titanium or some type of titanium alloy. They are designed for the heat.
The jet fuel burns hot,yes. But it burns fast.didnt burn long enough to melt steel.weaken it,yes.melt it,no.the residual fires from furniture and stuff sure wasn't hot enough either.
When they fell you should have seen the tops of towers lean over towards the impact sites.and I think thats all that should've happened.possibly the top floors could've broke off and fell.The buildings fell straight down into neat piles within their own footprints.only way that happens is a controlled demolition.
You can melt steel with a propane flame. This is how a gas blacksmithing forge works. Same idea could be expanded to fire within an elevator shaft. The column of rising air/flame would be superheated within this flue via convection. Explanations like these were given in the weeks after 9/11 and for a long time it stopped me thinking about it deeper. Easy to conceive that the jet fuel could have pooled at the base of the building(s) or coated the insides of the elevator shafts, ignited, and the high heat generated would have absolutely weakened the steel structure.
However... jet fuels are kerosene based. Pour some on your hand or fill up a bucket with it then try and light it. It won't. It must be aerolized into extremenly fine vapor via the jet engine injectors before it can be ignited. "But but but, that's what happened when the planes hit the building guyz!!!". That would have meant an immediate explosion which you do see in footage of the Twin Towers hits. That likely consumed most of the fuel right there and if so then none left to feed the flames that supposedly weakened the steel. A big circle of thought that eventually led me to "That could not have happened and if it did, what was the fuel source?".
Have you ever tried to cut steel with propane? I have and it takes forever to get it hot enough before you hit the blow lever.
I watched the Netflix documentary Turning Point: 9/11 and the War on Terror.
They zoom in on one of the towers collapsing and you can clearly see it fall inward on itself.