It was pretty cringey, but at one point he said this regarding the crash at the Pentagon:
What are you going to research? There are multiple eye witnesses to a plane crashing into the pentagon on 9/11, the flight was tracked by Air Traffic Control as out of contact with them and off track headed to Washington DC and coming down at the Pentagon, there was an explosion at the Pentagon after witnesses saw a plane flying very low overhead and clipping a street lamp before it hit the Pentagon, the passengers from that flight are all dead. You have a news reporter who in the heat of reporting what happened mistakenly said a missile hit the Pentagon. There were not witnesses to that. If you want to find the truth, don't disregard every witness and piece of evidence to it.
I replied:
Those are certainly some things I could research. How about you learn why NIST's report is no good, and I'll dig into one or two of these things.
Any of y'all have any good resources for those topics he mentioned? Or alternative explanations? It's been a while since I've humored a 9/11 Official Narrative believer, but figured maybe I'd dip into it again.
Fine. So why did the FBI confiscate the other 81 CCTV tapes that were looking at the Pentagon? Why were the air defenses disabled and how high up do you have to be do authorise that? Why was there a hole in E ring and C ring but not D ring? What is the chance of hitting the very wing that was closed 'for reinforcements'? What is the likelihood that the plane could actually make that impact at that speed without hitting the ground? Why would the fibreglass nosecone and aluminium fuselage make that hole, yet the engines didn't even leave a mark? Why were there no engines, luggage, bodies and other typical air crash debris at the scene? Why were the only pieces of wreckage small enough to be carried by hand? Given Building 7 was a controlled demolition, why do you think the Pentagon was not? Given there was no plane crash in Shanksville, what makes you think a plane actually hit the Pentagon?