It's likely that there isn't a page of exactly this on either the CDC or VAERS website.
Someone took the information on VAERS and then crunched the numbers on such.
If you plan on using VAERS as a source to try to convince others, you should be aware that it's an open source reporting system. That means anyone can make a report on virtually anything in regards to vaccines.
It's undeniably an important source of information, but the reports are not verified. If you read over the reports, you will see things like "source reports that they heard on the radio that 2,000 people died after getting X vaccine" and those 2,000 people would be counted as deaths.
A few years ago, a reporter was making a point about not using VAERS as evidence by reporting to it that he turned big, green and angry after getting a vaccine.
Anyway, people using it to try to convince normies should be prepared to hear them say that VAERS can't be used as evidence.
It's likely that there isn't a page of exactly this on either the CDC or VAERS website.
Someone took the information on VAERS and then crunched the numbers on such.
If you plan on using VAERS as a source to try to convince others, you should be aware that it's an open source reporting system. That means anyone can make a report on virtually anything in regards to vaccines.
It's undeniably an important source of information, but the reports are not verified. If you read over the reports, you will see things like "source reports that they heard on the radio that 2,000 people died after getting X vaccine" and those 2,000 people would be counted as deaths.
A few years ago, a reporter was making a point about not using VAERS as evidence by reporting to it that he turned big, green and angry after getting a vaccine.
Anyway, people using it to try to convince normies should be prepared to hear them say that VAERS can't be used as evidence.
Good luck.