1
ImaSueDeNym 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't recall Q speaking out against Jewish people, but that is definitely a topic brought up here constantly. And to be frank, it's extremely off-putting.

Add that to all the flat earth, lizard people stuff and it's no wonder why normies want nothing to do with going down the rabbit hole if that is what the uninitiated associate with Q.

2
ImaSueDeNym 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm amazed at how many people who are aware of how incompetent and destructive the government is still send their children off to government schools to be indoctrinated by leftists. It's just sad that people who are otherwise diligent about keeping the government out of their lives will send the most precious things in their lives to be overseen by that same government.

2
ImaSueDeNym 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember when the Mueller report first came out and democrats were angry that so much of it was redacted and saying that the stuff that was redacted was harmful to President Trump, or at least made him look bad. So it's going to be interesting to see how they're going to spin it when the truth of the matter comes out.

3
ImaSueDeNym 3 points ago +3 / -0

We criticize normies for believing everything they see or hear. We shouldn't do the same just because something confirms beliefs we already have.

This flyer looks like something created to trigger those who are against the vaccine and make us look ignorant when we think it's real. Don't play right into their hands.

1
ImaSueDeNym 1 point ago +1 / -0

I read the article and it said that the sheriff sent the Racine DA his recommended charges against the election commission.

I'm not well versed in legal terms but to me it reads like he didn't actually bring any charges against those people himself but sent his thoughts on what the charges should be to this other DA who would decide what, if anything, would be done.

Could someone who knows about this stuff do me a solid and clarify the matter?

1
ImaSueDeNym 1 point ago +1 / -0

Last I saw, he said he would use the Thanksgiving telethon to show his viewers what would have been presented to the Supreme Court.

Guess we'll just have to see what happens.

He was also saying he would continue to look for some AGs to present the case to the SC. So it might happen sometime in the future. Remember that these deadlines Lindell follows are all self imposed. So nothing is preventing him or anyone else presenting the case to the SC sometime in the future.

1
ImaSueDeNym 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is where parental responsibility comes into play and you use parental controls on your tv to restrict whatever program or channel you don't want your kids watching.

Or you talk to your kids and tell them why it's not ok to watch the commercial/program/channel you object to.

Or you get rid of the cable and/or tv.

Calling cable companies to complain about stuff like this might make you feel like your opinion matters, but it doesn't.

I remember my step mother back in the mid-90s getting involved with her church trying to stop cable and satellite companies airing risqué shows and commercials on daytime programs. They spent YEARS calling and writing people about it.

As you can see, no one cared much.

It's much easier to be a parent to your own kid rather than try to make cable companies parent peoples kids for them.

2
ImaSueDeNym 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. The hypocrisy of using guilt by association against those we dislike while ignoring the very same thing when done by those we agree with is cringy and petty. And it happens much too frequently.

3
ImaSueDeNym 3 points ago +4 / -1

I think this is also a good reason to not jump to conclusions whenever you see photos of leftists and democrats posing with known scum.

They do enough sketchy shit that can legitimately be criticized. We don't need to pounce on every photo that makes them guilty by association because photos like this will usually be the response.

And it's cringy to see other patriots responses to that scenario be, "But uh uh, that's fake! Who cares who President Trump is photographed with! It doesn't mean anything!"

3
ImaSueDeNym 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's time to get some younger people in office. I respect my elders, but so many of those in office are obviously just clinging to power out of ego. And it's not just the Democrats.

1
ImaSueDeNym 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not trying to start an argument, just trying to understand this.

What is the significance of it not being isolated in humans? I'm interpreting it as meaning that humans aren't being infected by it.

So what does it actually mean?

6
ImaSueDeNym 6 points ago +6 / -0

I was going to comment on that until I saw your post.

I was going to ask how can she be saying that we're being infected with a virus but that same virus has never been isolated in humans.

I thought I was just missing something that was obvious to everyone else. Glad to know I'm not the only one who thought there was a problem with it.

0
ImaSueDeNym 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's really difficult to win a libel or slander suit. It's almost always a waste of time and money.

Biden definitely should have kept his mouth shut. He really had no business bringing the kid up. His handlers should do a better job in keeping him from speaking. He's always sticking his foot in his mouth or saying something truly idiotic.

But we can't have double standards. It's beneath us and puts on the same level as leftists. They are always going on about suing President Trump for slander or libel for this, that, or the other now that he is a private citizen again. And it was worse when he was President.

1
ImaSueDeNym 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm not defending Biden, but if he said it as a private citizen, doesn't he have freedom of speech?

Denying people their constitutional rights is something leftists do.

1
ImaSueDeNym 1 point ago +1 / -0

What exactly do you mean by "future credits"?

I completely understand that the money used to cover the stimulus checks adds to our national debt and will have to be paid at some point.

But that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about people who are filing their taxes next year and problems that will happen because of the stimulus money.

view more: Next ›