They're just trying to discredit the data. It's very telling data. Go look at it yourself, unless you're a glowie. 33.9% of ALL vax-suspected adverse events that have been reported to the CDC since 1921 are for covid shots. 44,000 of those are considered "serious" adverse events. The shot is bullshit. We have the cure (ivermectin) the experiment should be over. But it's not an experiment, it's an attack, so of course it isn't over.
I know the numbers and the reality, I'm just confused about what the guy was saying. He said it's CDC data, so why would they be trying to discredit their own data? The data in there is reported by doctors and hospitals, the CDC would just erase it if they didn't want it out, but they can't stop real reporting from health care places.
They want people to be able to say "It says right there it doesn't prove a causal relationship" so they don't have to listen to it.
The fact is, the data is extremely telling. No other vaccine has anywhere near that number of reports in its entire history, much less the first year of its existence. When you take into consideration the fact that the creator of it said it was dangerous and not near ready, the fact that it was given emergency use authorization and thus, is essentially an experimental drug, you can't just ignore statistics like that.
In fact, fuck the claim that they can't prove a causal relationship. Those numbers are so fucking far outside the standard deviation of all other vaccines that it would be insane not to declare it unsafe and in need of further testing.
But as I've said before, this is not even an experiment, it's an attack. That's why it will keep going regardless.
Last I hard vaers was started in 1990. I try to point out the spike in reports to people and I get the it iSn't verified crap. Then I ask them if they think the spike is something in the water and it's crickets after that. Many are unable to think that maybe, just maybe something might be wrong with the vax. TV has the retards programed.
Their data goes back to 1921 regardless. If you start counting adverse events in 1990 the data gets even more convincing, honestly. Because now covid reports would become an even larger percentage of total reports.
I haven't looked or seen data past 1990, but I know it has doubled to more than the past 30 years combined. Retards like to say it isn't verified but they're too stupid and they think it must be something in the water. iT cAnt be thE vAX!
They're just trying to discredit the data. It's very telling data. Go look at it yourself, unless you're a glowie. 33.9% of ALL vax-suspected adverse events that have been reported to the CDC since 1921 are for covid shots. 44,000 of those are considered "serious" adverse events. The shot is bullshit. We have the cure (ivermectin) the experiment should be over. But it's not an experiment, it's an attack, so of course it isn't over.
I know the numbers and the reality, I'm just confused about what the guy was saying. He said it's CDC data, so why would they be trying to discredit their own data? The data in there is reported by doctors and hospitals, the CDC would just erase it if they didn't want it out, but they can't stop real reporting from health care places.
They want people to be able to say "It says right there it doesn't prove a causal relationship" so they don't have to listen to it.
The fact is, the data is extremely telling. No other vaccine has anywhere near that number of reports in its entire history, much less the first year of its existence. When you take into consideration the fact that the creator of it said it was dangerous and not near ready, the fact that it was given emergency use authorization and thus, is essentially an experimental drug, you can't just ignore statistics like that.
In fact, fuck the claim that they can't prove a causal relationship. Those numbers are so fucking far outside the standard deviation of all other vaccines that it would be insane not to declare it unsafe and in need of further testing.
But as I've said before, this is not even an experiment, it's an attack. That's why it will keep going regardless.
Last I hard vaers was started in 1990. I try to point out the spike in reports to people and I get the it iSn't verified crap. Then I ask them if they think the spike is something in the water and it's crickets after that. Many are unable to think that maybe, just maybe something might be wrong with the vax. TV has the retards programed.
Their data goes back to 1921 regardless. If you start counting adverse events in 1990 the data gets even more convincing, honestly. Because now covid reports would become an even larger percentage of total reports.
I haven't looked or seen data past 1990, but I know it has doubled to more than the past 30 years combined. Retards like to say it isn't verified but they're too stupid and they think it must be something in the water. iT cAnt be thE vAX!