If true, I could imagine being read in on the 'actual' nuclear power while being told that much of what they had been taught on the subject for the previous years were false before being filled in on how things actually work.
Thanks, conceptually this makes sense but would need something more tangible for me to accept.
I have no issues with the various types of comms. It makes sense that nuclear threats are comms more than literal threats.
The thing is, to say that nuclear energy is a fiction. THAT is where I would need something more convincing. Some alternative that can fill the gaps.
If true, I could imagine being read in on the 'actual' nuclear power while being told that much of what they had been taught on the subject for the previous years were false before being filled in on how things actually work.
Thanks, conceptually this makes sense but would need something more tangible for me to accept.