More people are likely to watch a ten minute video than they are to watch a 2 hour video. Right now it should be about getting the info out to as many viewers as possible, and I think he does a good job. Certain interviews I want to watch on and on but are cut short - it keeps me coming back tho
Sure, they don't all have to be 2 hours. But he could have a short version and a long version. He's doing good work, but he is not allowing interviews to really get to important topics in many cases. Several interviewees are wanting to continue to talk and the interview is over. This is not radio or TV.
I've got a real problem with Stew Peters.
WTF is he always cutting off interviews at artificially short times? 10 minutes? Maybe an hour in some cases.
This is the INTERNET. He could do an interview for way more time and get a lot more detail, but he never does.
Why?
More people are likely to watch a ten minute video than they are to watch a 2 hour video. Right now it should be about getting the info out to as many viewers as possible, and I think he does a good job. Certain interviews I want to watch on and on but are cut short - it keeps me coming back tho
I think you right, and I think there are studies that show most people spend 10 seconds on each link before moving on.
Sure, they don't all have to be 2 hours. But he could have a short version and a long version. He's doing good work, but he is not allowing interviews to really get to important topics in many cases. Several interviewees are wanting to continue to talk and the interview is over. This is not radio or TV.