Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

249
() Cabal History Theory
posted 3 years ago by Quelle 3 years ago by Quelle +252 / -3
131 comments share
131 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (131)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– Distinger 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

My understanding is that Tesla didn't refute Einstein because his theory didn't marry E&M with gravity, but because he couldn't comprehend the math behind it.

Which is too bad since the math has been shown to be an accurate model for our solar system, better than what existed before.

Also, Einstein didn't base his theory on the principle that spacetime is deformable/warped/curved/etc. That was only an insight that came to him while he struggled to integrate gravity into special relativity. But I would submit that just because he leveraged Riemann's equations to help him with his own, it doesn't necessarily mean that spacetime is curved or anything (even though he concluded it did), but instead it shows that Riemann's equations, which were developed for measuring distances in a manifold of any dimensions, works for spacetime. It could be that nothing is curved, but the effects that gravity has on light behaves as if it is curved. There could be another reason for it we have yet to understand fully.

As for Tesla, I'm disappointed. He had an opportunity to build upon some great work, but he didn't. It seems to me he was the only one sporting any ego.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Slyver 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Which is too bad since the math has been shown to be an accurate model for our solar system, better than what existed before.

Can you show me the evidence of this? I have seen no such theory.

just because he leveraged Riemann's equations to help him with his own, it doesn't necessarily mean that spacetime is curved or anything (even though he concluded it did), but instead it shows that Riemann's equations, which were developed for measuring distances in a manifold of any dimensions, works for spacetime

Enough with the really good responses. You're making me dig deep here. (Not really, its great!)

I agree that "Curvature" (and Riemann's extension of the concept) is purely a mathematical construct. It doesn't have any real physical meaning. We give meaning to these concepts through the filter of how we define what it means to be physical (to have a "physical distance" or a "movement in time"). Our ideas of physicality may be deeply flawed.

Einstein's GR equation says that the mathematical construct of curvature (and measurements of distance in the 4 dimensional spacetime) IS energy density distribution. They are the same thing. But its really only saying that changes in energy density distribution, between two measurement points, which is something we can measure, can change 3 velocity measurements and time measurements (another thing we can measure) based on your observer point. It also says the 4 velocity (and 4 momentum) measurements will always be the same for all observers.

The point is, you can think of a deformation (and its resulting curvature) of spacetime as an energy density distribution (like a gradient), or a change in the mathematical construct of curvature, and you will arrive at the same answer either way.

The idea of a 4 vector gives meaning to spacetime as a physical entity. But our measurements do coincide with the physical meaning we give (arbitrarily) to curvature, and thus the problem is, this confirmation bias reinforces our marriage to the physical concept overlays we attribute to it.

To effectively divorce these concepts we would have to be motivated to do so (which many are), but we would also have to come up with completely new ideas of what it means to be "real".

All measurements in physics, or any other physical science are ultimately measurements of two things; spatial and temporal distance. When you measure temperature, or power output, or any other measurement, when you break it down to brass tacks, you are really measuring a movement through space and time. That is why the physical universe as we have defined it (and the concept of curvature that we overlay on it) are so powerful. Those concepts help us measure everything that isn't spiritual or psychological (if those two concepts even have different meanings).

Until we can find another thought paradigm than physical reality as having "distance" in time and space, we are ultimately also married to curvature of space and time, because it works out so well in measurement. Even if we use the other side of the equation (energy density distribution), ignoring the curvature part (which allows us to accurately measure distances in space and time) is disingenuous without that paradigm shift in our concept of reality.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Distinger 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Can you show me the evidence of this? I have seen no such theory.

The best evidence is the application of the GR field equations to predict the orbit of the planet Mercury, which before GR had an unexplained anomaly with it's perihelion precession. Any good book on GR will walk you through it. It's probably the strongest test of GR and considered a hallmark proof that the equations do accurately predict planetary orbits around our Sun.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Slyver 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

My understanding is that Tesla didn't refute Einstein because his theory didn't marry E&M with gravity, but because he couldn't comprehend the math behind it. Which is too bad since the math has been shown to be an accurate model for our solar system, better than what existed before.

I think we might have gotten signals crossed here. I thought you meant Tesla had a theory of E&M gravity that gave a better prediction of planetary motion than GR. That was what I was asking evidence for. I am aware of the predictions and measurements that asserted GR.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Distinger 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It would seem so.

Great exchange though, thank you.

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield - Together We Win

Rules

Q Supporters:
This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"

Follow the Law:
No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!

No Bad Behavior!
No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!

Civil Discussion ONLY:
They want you divided.
They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.
Divided you are weak [no collective power].
Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].

No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion:
Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.

Questions and Concerns: All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.

Expand your thinking:
Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!

No doomers, shills, or tards: THIS IS AN ELITE RESEARCH BOARD. If you can't use common sense you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding. Q said "We are saving Israel for last," and so are we. And if you're a tard, oh, man.

General Rules:

-Mods used to issue warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. We don't, anymore. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

-Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current. We try to keep an open mind, but... c'mon.

-Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum. No crap, off-topic memes

-HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO participation only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait. Keep your comments high effort. No BS.

-No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, frogs!

-Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info trash, pls. Excessive, low-effort posting may earn users vacations!

-Keep it honest and accurate.

-Patriots.win / Q Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, this train still has no brakes.)

-Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their command of Q, sincerity, and respect to others.

Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING! (Hi, Mike! You LOSER!)

Resources

  • WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD
  • "River of Search" script:
  • GAW post formatting tips
  • Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)
  • Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4
  • Browse Drops from the beginning
  • QProofs.com
  • Learn to read the Q map
  • Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)
  • Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources
  • Trumps twitter archive
  • POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm
  • Pedosta and DNC dumps
  • GIFs & QPosts
  • Poll Post Format
  • SPY ON US! See: mod Logs
  • The Greatest Show on Earth!
  • New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?" DO NOT MISS THIS PODCAST!

Disclaimer

Posts and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the GreatAwakening.win or Patriots.win administration.

Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 6 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2024.12.01 - q54tz (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy