The point of attaching lies to a Freemason is that you can use the truths to blend the lies.
School brainwashed them into believing those people invented it when all they did was manipulate it and hide the important bits.
This sounds to me like you (and others) are using the ideas that the FM can't be trusted, and using that lack of trust to extend it to these other people not having actually contributed their contributions. I am asking for evidence that those assertions are true. I am not asking for evidence that the FM are liars. I am not asking for evidence that Newton was a FM. Neither of those points are contested.
I am asking for evidence that Newton did not do the work attributed to Newton.
I guess I am also asking for evidence that the work associated with Newton purposefully hid things.
I have yet to see any evidence that supports those statements.
Here is what I see is the logic:
FM are liars.
Newton was a FM.
Everything Newton did was a lie.
That does NOT logically follow. That is an error in logic. I want evidence that links 1 and 2 with 3. I have seen none so far (not counting Calculus for which I have given an argument to the contrary, and concede it might be partially (but not fully) true).
See, I can't even comprehend how you are arriving at this conclusion based on anything I have said. It's like we aren't speaking the same language.
You have made the assertion that Newton and Einstein did not do the great works attributed to them. I have asked for evidence to support that statement. You will notice that that has NOTHING TO DO WITH the Freemasons.
So why would you get "you trust the freemasons" from something that has nothing to do with the freemasons?
I have studied the works of Newton and Einstein extensively. Their WORK is their work, unless I see evidence to the contrary. You have made the assertion that there is evidence to the contrary. I have asked to see it. There is nothing more going on here.
I never said it does. Why aren't you addressing the question i am actually asking.
I asked to be shown the evidence that Isaac Newton was not the original author of the work attributed to him. I am not disputing any other claim here.
Do you not see the flaw in believing any evidence to the contrary if it fits in with a larger belief system? That is confirmation bias.
"Because Newton was a FM, and there is controversy of the origin of calculus, all of his work was fraudulent."
There is no logic there, that is a desire to discredit everything, because of something else unrelated.
This sounds to me like you (and others) are using the ideas that the FM can't be trusted, and using that lack of trust to extend it to these other people not having actually contributed their contributions. I am asking for evidence that those assertions are true. I am not asking for evidence that the FM are liars. I am not asking for evidence that Newton was a FM. Neither of those points are contested.
I am asking for evidence that Newton did not do the work attributed to Newton.
I guess I am also asking for evidence that the work associated with Newton purposefully hid things.
I have yet to see any evidence that supports those statements.
Here is what I see is the logic:
That does NOT logically follow. That is an error in logic. I want evidence that links 1 and 2 with 3. I have seen none so far (not counting Calculus for which I have given an argument to the contrary, and concede it might be partially (but not fully) true).
See, I can't even comprehend how you are arriving at this conclusion based on anything I have said. It's like we aren't speaking the same language.
You have made the assertion that Newton and Einstein did not do the great works attributed to them. I have asked for evidence to support that statement. You will notice that that has NOTHING TO DO WITH the Freemasons.
So why would you get "you trust the freemasons" from something that has nothing to do with the freemasons?
I have studied the works of Newton and Einstein extensively. Their WORK is their work, unless I see evidence to the contrary. You have made the assertion that there is evidence to the contrary. I have asked to see it. There is nothing more going on here.