See, I can't even comprehend how you are arriving at this conclusion based on anything I have said. It's like we aren't speaking the same language.
You have made the assertion that Newton and Einstein did not do the great works attributed to them. I have asked for evidence to support that statement. You will notice that that has NOTHING TO DO WITH the Freemasons.
So why would you get "you trust the freemasons" from something that has nothing to do with the freemasons?
I have studied the works of Newton and Einstein extensively. Their WORK is their work, unless I see evidence to the contrary. You have made the assertion that there is evidence to the contrary. I have asked to see it. There is nothing more going on here.
Here is the problem with your logic. You know Fauci lied because there is evidence he lied. There is no evidence that holds up to rebuttal (that I have seen so far) that supports the statements you have made about Einstein and Newton. You believe, because the FM are untrustworthy, that ALL FM stuff put out must be fraudulent. Not only must it be fraudulent, but it must be fraudulent in the exact way you believe it to be even though you can't provide evidence to support that assertion.
The Constitution and the DoI were written largely by Freemasons. Does that make the Constitution and DoI completely fraudulent?
I personally do think there is a flaw in both of them, and that flaw actually led to exactly what we have today, but that doesn't make the entire thing fraudulent. It actually only makes that one teensy tiny bit (with huge eventual impact) a fraud. In the case of the Constitution it is only the very last part of the 5th amendment, and one single word change in the DoI that undid the entire things. So they are frauds imo, but only ever so slightly. The entire rest of it was the most brilliant set of documents of all time.
Thank you for adding this, because it perfectly explains what I am saying.
I know that Joe Biden did not win the election because of the substantial amount of evidence to the contrary (and my own mathematical analysis on it).
I do not know that Einstein and Newton did not do the work attributed to them because there is no fucking evidence to dispute it.
If that is an incorrect statement, then evidence would exist to dispute it.
I am asking for that evidence.
I am not going to believe something because you believe it can't be true. Especially since the argument presented so far has, by my analysis, logical flaws which I have pointed out.
See, I can't even comprehend how you are arriving at this conclusion based on anything I have said. It's like we aren't speaking the same language.
You have made the assertion that Newton and Einstein did not do the great works attributed to them. I have asked for evidence to support that statement. You will notice that that has NOTHING TO DO WITH the Freemasons.
So why would you get "you trust the freemasons" from something that has nothing to do with the freemasons?
I have studied the works of Newton and Einstein extensively. Their WORK is their work, unless I see evidence to the contrary. You have made the assertion that there is evidence to the contrary. I have asked to see it. There is nothing more going on here.
Here is the problem with your logic. You know Fauci lied because there is evidence he lied. There is no evidence that holds up to rebuttal (that I have seen so far) that supports the statements you have made about Einstein and Newton. You believe, because the FM are untrustworthy, that ALL FM stuff put out must be fraudulent. Not only must it be fraudulent, but it must be fraudulent in the exact way you believe it to be even though you can't provide evidence to support that assertion.
The Constitution and the DoI were written largely by Freemasons. Does that make the Constitution and DoI completely fraudulent?
I personally do think there is a flaw in both of them, and that flaw actually led to exactly what we have today, but that doesn't make the entire thing fraudulent. It actually only makes that one teensy tiny bit (with huge eventual impact) a fraud. In the case of the Constitution it is only the very last part of the 5th amendment, and one single word change in the DoI that undid the entire things. So they are frauds imo, but only ever so slightly. The entire rest of it was the most brilliant set of documents of all time.
Slyver,
I understand 100% what you're asking (and saying). You've been clear and concise, and explained your logic perfectly.
Yes, exactly.
I have asked you for evidence to the contrary.
Thank you for adding this, because it perfectly explains what I am saying.
I know that Joe Biden did not win the election because of the substantial amount of evidence to the contrary (and my own mathematical analysis on it).
I do not know that Einstein and Newton did not do the work attributed to them because there is no fucking evidence to dispute it.
If that is an incorrect statement, then evidence would exist to dispute it.
I am asking for that evidence.
I am not going to believe something because you believe it can't be true. Especially since the argument presented so far has, by my analysis, logical flaws which I have pointed out.