Here is the problem with your logic. You know Fauci lied because there is evidence he lied. There is no evidence that holds up to rebuttal (that I have seen so far) that supports the statements you have made about Einstein and Newton. You believe, because the FM are untrustworthy, that ALL FM stuff put out must be fraudulent. Not only must it be fraudulent, but it must be fraudulent in the exact way you believe it to be even though you can't provide evidence to support that assertion.
The Constitution and the DoI were written largely by Freemasons. Does that make the Constitution and DoI completely fraudulent?
I personally do think there is a flaw in both of them, and that flaw actually led to exactly what we have today, but that doesn't make the entire thing fraudulent. It actually only makes that one teensy tiny bit (with huge eventual impact) a fraud. In the case of the Constitution it is only the very last part of the 5th amendment, and one single word change in the DoI that undid the entire things. So they are frauds imo, but only ever so slightly. The entire rest of it was the most brilliant set of documents of all time.
It makes perfect sense. I just don't see how it is related to anything I have said or asked of you.
You have made a claim; that Newton and Einstein did not do the work they are credited with.
I have asked for evidence to support that claim.
You keep coming back with things I consider to be irrelevant, and certainly not supportive of those claims.
Does that make sense?
I am an evidence based person. That doesn't mean I don't "suppose" or "extrapolate," but I don't make claims based on those suppositions or extrapolations because they are completely speculative. If there is no real evidence to support my suppositions I consider them to be otherwise meaningless except as a thought to keep in mind when looking for evidence.
Any other use of suppositions is a flight of fancy, and useless in the process of decision making. In fact, they are harmful in decision making because they allow a person to make decisions based on fear of those suppositions. And fear based suppositions without evidence are the worst form of human behavior, and are exactly the reason we have the world we have today.
Here is the problem with your logic. You know Fauci lied because there is evidence he lied. There is no evidence that holds up to rebuttal (that I have seen so far) that supports the statements you have made about Einstein and Newton. You believe, because the FM are untrustworthy, that ALL FM stuff put out must be fraudulent. Not only must it be fraudulent, but it must be fraudulent in the exact way you believe it to be even though you can't provide evidence to support that assertion.
The Constitution and the DoI were written largely by Freemasons. Does that make the Constitution and DoI completely fraudulent?
I personally do think there is a flaw in both of them, and that flaw actually led to exactly what we have today, but that doesn't make the entire thing fraudulent. It actually only makes that one teensy tiny bit (with huge eventual impact) a fraud. In the case of the Constitution it is only the very last part of the 5th amendment, and one single word change in the DoI that undid the entire things. So they are frauds imo, but only ever so slightly. The entire rest of it was the most brilliant set of documents of all time.
Slyver,
I understand 100% what you're asking (and saying). You've been clear and concise, and explained your logic perfectly.
You are making this statement but not providing evidence.
I don't think you are reading what I am writing.
I am well aware of the Fauci AIDS fraud.
It makes perfect sense. I just don't see how it is related to anything I have said or asked of you.
You have made a claim; that Newton and Einstein did not do the work they are credited with.
I have asked for evidence to support that claim.
You keep coming back with things I consider to be irrelevant, and certainly not supportive of those claims.
Does that make sense?
I am an evidence based person. That doesn't mean I don't "suppose" or "extrapolate," but I don't make claims based on those suppositions or extrapolations because they are completely speculative. If there is no real evidence to support my suppositions I consider them to be otherwise meaningless except as a thought to keep in mind when looking for evidence.
Any other use of suppositions is a flight of fancy, and useless in the process of decision making. In fact, they are harmful in decision making because they allow a person to make decisions based on fear of those suppositions. And fear based suppositions without evidence are the worst form of human behavior, and are exactly the reason we have the world we have today.