Proceeds to send a university-wide email full of cognitive dissonance, such as:
"The positive test result I received this morning and the mild symptoms I’ve experienced thus far also point to the fact that the COVID-19 vaccines are indeed doing their job."
"I received my COVID-19 vaccinations earlier this spring and I am so grateful I did."
"I want to use this moment to encourage all of our students, faculty and staff to get vaccinated if you have not done so already."
Clown world, folks.
This is the claim: Get the jabs and if you get COVID-19, you will get a milder case than if you were not vaccinated.
Well, everyone is different and everyone, vaxxed and unvaxxed, are having different symptoms and different degrees of symptoms. Some have mild cases and some have major cases -- it doesn't matter what your vaxxed status is.
Therefore, it is impossible to make the claim that the vax does anything to mitigate COVID-19, as there is no possible way to definitively prove this.
The problem is that a "symptom" is often subjective and not objective.
If you have a fever of 101.4 degrees, that is objective. But if you have a "headache," that is more subjective. What is a headache to you is not so much to me, nevermind "mild," "severe," etc. On top of that, there is no way to know what caused that headache. Maybe you were on the computer late at night and got eye strain, resulting in a headache. All subjective and not possible to prove.
Here is the best collection of hard data I have found on this whole thing:
https://www.primarydoctor.org/covidvaccine
If by "this" you mean, "Can the vaxx actually reduce or weaken symptoms?" I do believe that there are studies that show this, among them Pfizer's own studies (iirc). A recent paper (I don't have the sauce on hand, tho) also showed that Pfizer's efficacy was as low as 40-some percent and Moderna's only slightly higher. Exciting, right? /s
Wrong. Pfizer's study showed that the vaxxed had MORE symptoms than the placebo group.
Pfizer LIED about their own study results.
See page 42
https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
It was "suspected but unconfirmed" due to the symptoms. Later, they did the PCR "test" and a higher percentage of vaxxed were PCR+ than the placebo group, so they STOPPED testing the test group.
That's where they came up with the 162 vs 8 (i.e. "95% effective").
The entire thing was a sham and a lie.
I don't disagree with you, please don't misunderstand. Most (if not all) C19 studies being bounced around and cited by universities, medical institutions, and politicians/political agencies are worthless (case in point: the FDA study you linked to). Statistics are all fun and games until someone with common sense starts playing...
What I wrote is simply that there is so-called data out there, whether meaningful (to us who understand the gaslighting) or not. There is data being reported, what I said isn't wrong there, but is it good data? Well, you said it yourself. It's a sham and a lie.
I think both the PCR tests and the jabs are being used abusively at best and as tools for crimes against humanity, depopulation, etc at worst.
1st of all, the testing is BULLSHIT
2nd of all......The VAX is BULLSHIT
And last but most importantly.......the last variant will be COMMUNISM
thank you
Well, the Pfizer study actually DID show that those who got injected with the mystery drug had MORE symptoms and had a HIGHER percentage with a PCR+ result than those who got the placebo.
So, he ain't wrong ... but he ain't right, either.