I don't think it does. Coercion requires an act by the victim. Quitting is an act. Just like taking a vax is an act. She suffers loss due to forced coercion and has a civil law suit. Our cases will soon be stronger as truth about the Vax becomes more mainstream.
Your interpretation isn't shared by most legal professionals. Their advice is to not quit, but to allow the firing to occur. The reason, as I stated before, is quitting severely limits your legal options.
The "act" of being fired as a result of coercion is much more powerful than one's choice to quit.
Absolutely correct. She may be courageous, but she should not have quit. This is what the medical tyrants want. It leaves them clear of legal action.
I don't think it does. Coercion requires an act by the victim. Quitting is an act. Just like taking a vax is an act. She suffers loss due to forced coercion and has a civil law suit. Our cases will soon be stronger as truth about the Vax becomes more mainstream.
Your interpretation isn't shared by most legal professionals. Their advice is to not quit, but to allow the firing to occur. The reason, as I stated before, is quitting severely limits your legal options.
The "act" of being fired as a result of coercion is much more powerful than one's choice to quit.