THIS. IS. MASSIVE. 💣
Strangely, not headline news in MSM...
Director and Deputy Director of the Office of Vaccines Research at the FDA RESIGN.
And then...
They sign this letter in prestigious British medical journal The Lancet advising against COVID booster shots
(threadreaderapp.com)
ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
This is partly true, but here is my question - do you really think after they finally jolted awake that boosters are obviouslt bad (even to their threshold of whats bad) AND they resigned their positions as a result, that they have not already started to wonder about the first two doses?
I thin partly they are still trying to convince themselves that they didnt do anything wrong until now, its just the boosters that are bad.
This is a psychological subconscious defence mechanism. Accepting you did wrong is bad enough, but accepting you did wrong to the point of murdering people is almost impossible for most minds to accept. They will rationalise anyway they want. Infact, coming out against boosters is a big part of rationalising they are not evil. Internally the thinking goes "See, I am willing to sacrifice my career over boosters. No way I could have gone along with murder ever"
I know people like these. They may fight as much as they like about boosters, but they will defend the original vaccines with their lives. I hope I am wrong, but we will see.
Oh I'm sure they have. But as you note, if it was all a lie then they were unknowingly complicit is some soul crushing approvals and advisories. I don't think they are there yet. That's hard to accept. It's going to take a lot of research and investigation before they are ready to accept that possibility themselves, let alone try and publish literal heresy supporting it.
These higher up positions are political, even if you're an honest scientist filling them. You have to have political skills. So they know they lose nothing extolling the vaccine if it buys them the necessary capital to have additional boosters pushed back on.
The whole article is littered with reasonings that even the staunchest pro covid vax supporter can get behind. "The boosters are more effective used on the unvaccinated" comes to mind in particular.
Their goal is to convince the world not to pursue endless rounds of boosters, (and I think this articles makes the case for it, if it would ever be reported on) while pushing back on the vaccinations, even if they are already there, can come later.