Thanks for the reply, but I'm still not understanding. Are you saying that Obama himself was actually arrested, then ... what ... blackmailed while in custody (shown pictures/documents, etc), and then released into the wild again (so normies don't get concerned), with VERY specific instructions as to how he must behave ("do what we say or we'll release info ...")? So for example, Obama appeared in TV ads recently in support of Newsom in California, speaking aggressively against Trump and in support of Newsom. Was that 'allowed' under the terms of his arrest/release? Similarly, Bill Gates has appeared numerous times in the media, saying pretty much what he's always said about vaccines, viruses, etc.
So my general conclusion is, these people are 'doing what they've always done', and that doesn't seem to meet the definition for being 'arrested' or 'suppressed'.
Thanks for the reply, but I'm still not understanding. Are you saying that Obama himself was actually arrested, then ... what ... blackmailed while in custody (shown pictures/documents, etc), and then released into the wild again (so normies don't get concerned), with VERY specific instructions as to how he must behave ("do what we say or we'll release info ...")? So for example, Obama appeared in TV ads recently in support of Newsom in California, speaking aggressively against Trump and in support of Newsom. Was that 'allowed' under the terms of his arrest/release? Similarly, Bill Gates has appeared numerous times in the media, saying pretty much what he's always said about vaccines, viruses, etc.
So my general conclusion is, these people are 'doing what they've always done', and that doesn't seem to meet the definition for being 'arrested' or 'suppressed'.