That would be true, if no previous GJ has been empaneled on the matter and voted to indict.
Remember, we were looking at an astronomical number of sealed federal records during the early days of Q. Some mistakenly assumed ALL were indictments, which is highly unlikely. Simplest explanation is that many (speculated as 90%?) of sealed docs could be supporting records that follow specific indictments.
Alternatively, a single sealed indictment could name 50 people.
That would be true, if no previous GJ has been empaneled on the matter and voted to indict.
Remember, we were looking at an astronomical number of sealed federal records during the early days of Q. Some mistakenly assumed ALL were indictments, which is highly unlikely. Simplest explanation is that many (speculated as 90%?) of sealed docs could be supporting records that follow specific indictments.
Alternatively, a single sealed indictment could name 50 people.