I just read the indictment, and holy shit.
To start, Sussman is billing the Hillary campaign as he's taking these meetings, coordinating the production and dissemination of false constructed narratives, and working on behalf of not only the campaign, but for this "Tech Executive-1" who runs and manages 3 different "Internet Companies" as it pertains to this indictment.
The "Internet Company-1" handles massive amounts of data, much of it is traffic, which is then sent to the two other companies for analysis, business strategy, etc. "Tech Exec-1" produces a LIST of 20 Trump insiders, family members, etc with their names, addresses, birthdays, email accounts, domains, the works - and instructs the data analytics folks to dig DEEEEP for anything they can find, so that a "VIP" can be very pleased if they get some juicy details.
A researcher sees a domain "mail.trump-mail.com" has a dns/traffic request to a .ru or "Russian Bank" company, and they instruct the researchers to dig. The researchers not only claim that it looks like a red herring, but that any technical person would tear the claims apart, as they can't even prove it if it was a spoofed request or not. They tell the "Tech Exec-1" that it wouldn't hold up to any level of scrutiny, and that they have blinders on. Everyone agrees.
Sussman and the "Tech Exec-1" start working on a "White Paper" in secret, outlining a "plausible" scenario, void of any technical links and present the paper back to the researchers and ask they to just give it a glance and take their DNS researcher hats off for a second... Does this white paper look plausible? The researchers commend the "Tech Exec-1" for putting together a plausible paper, and compliment him for steering clear of the hurdles that would raise concerns...
Sussman starts working with media outlets to prep stories, just before going to the FBI (and later a second agency, unnamed) to present the white paper on behalf of NO client, just a concerned citizen.
This indictment nails Sussman for lying about doing this on behalf of his client(s), ALTHOUGH, it's likely MUCH more damaging than we can even imagine - the LIBEL and SLANDER laws alone against a corporation (Trump Organization) are far reaching, there was MILLIONS in damages, lost contracts, etc. This is like a tee'd up case, and I don't think they're done yet!
What "Tech Exec-1" likely did is blatantly illegal too - even if it's on the libel/slander train. BUT WOW - Is this the "Big G" tech company? Their CEO was on the campaign trail for Hillary... I wouldn't be surprised.
FUCKING BOOM.
Lets consider Eric Schmidt (possibly Tech Executive-1):
Timeline in Google (Possibly Internet Company-1):
CEO : 2001 - 2011
Executive Chairman of Google: 2011 - 2017 Dec 21
Other companies: (He had his finger in a lot of pies, but I think these two companies are interesting)
Investor in The Groundwork (Internet Company-2 ?), a start-up company associated with HRC campaign. Most of the Groundwork's employees are back-end software developers with experience at tech firms like Netflix, DreamHost, Zalando, and Google. Guessing its like a place to siphon data from Google/FB/Twitter etc and keep it in a separate backend to do data analytics
Schmidt is an investor in Timshel (Internet Company-3 ?, another start up company associated with HRC campaign. Timshel is the parent company of The Groundwork. The company seems to be defunct, my guess is, its a second layer shell between Google and Groundwork.
Possibly his involvement with HRC Campaign started in June 2014 with the creation of Groundwork.
In March 2, 2016, looks like he was made the chairman of the DoD Innovation Advisory Board by Ash Carter, Obama's SecDef - was this his reward ?
His leaving Google in Dec 21, 2017 is not a coincidence, considering Durham started in Oct 28 2017 (along with first Q drop), and Q has posted a lot about Eric Schmidt. He was involved in NK, Myanmar - all [DS] hubs.
Here is an excerpt from a Slate article: "Alphabet is the parent company of Google, whose online empire Schmidt presided over as CEO and executive chairman for 17 years of unrelenting growth."
17 years at Google? Can you even make this up ?
Timshel is based in Chicago. Founder Michael Slaby was Obama’s CTO.
Google, Facebook, Amazon and Twitter made huge investments in the Chicago area where Clintons, Podestas and Obamas have deep connections.
Anna Makanju led the censorship efforts at Facebook, was the advisor on Biden’s Ukraine deals, and led community organizing for Soros, Obama, Clintons and Bidens.
Why is the Prairie School next to Google in Chicago?
Why did Zuckerberg, CTCL of Chicago and other partners focus on using Racine as the gateway and model district to rig Wisconsin and the swing states?
Racine is the reason why Nancy Pelosi said this before the election:
Looks like the majority of the Afghan 'refugees' are being sent to Camp Douglas, Wisconsin also...check out this MonkeyWerx video (starts around 24:38) https://youtu.be/XrNWPUgyiE8?t=1478