Sussmann was mentioned in news as speaking with FBI back when but, Q laid out unknown things back then that are now coming to light (those things are the proofs) like his graph showing the relationships between Perkins, Fusion etc and him saying read carefully means he is telling us this is important before we knew how important it is but being Durhams 2nd indictment means it is super important.
Ok, thanks. I'm afraid this is exactly of the "coincidence" variety of proof to 100% of normies.
When (and if) he knew, he could have written the things out in clear text, not just indicating relationships and writing intentionally obscure "code language".
Sussmann was mentioned in news as speaking with FBI back when but, Q laid out unknown things back then that are now coming to light (those things are the proofs) like his graph showing the relationships between Perkins, Fusion etc and him saying read carefully means he is telling us this is important before we knew how important it is but being Durhams 2nd indictment means it is super important.
Ok, thanks. I'm afraid this is exactly of the "coincidence" variety of proof to 100% of normies.
When (and if) he knew, he could have written the things out in clear text, not just indicating relationships and writing intentionally obscure "code language".
We who already believe need no further proofs.