What does the "science" say?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
Where did I say anything that remotely resembles anything like this statement? This is called a strawman. I did not say anything like this. I was addressing specific fears for which there is no evidence. I have made thousands of posts of the dangers of the vaccines. Those posts are based on corroborated evidence.
Not only does it not exist yet, but there isn't any current evidence that supports the fear at all.
This isn't about money (well, not primarily). This is about teaching people to give up their freedoms "for the good of the many." Such a lesson is a primer for their "Great Reset" which will ask people to give up ALL freedoms for the good of the many (the insidious path to total population slavery used by all communist, socialist, and fascist regimes).
The evidence suggests it does a lot of harm, though the evidence also suggests its not as harmful as many people fear it is. There is disinformation on both sides of this issue. I have spent hundreds of hours writing the details and analyses about this disinformation on both sides.
Science is not meant to be trusted. It is actually designed to be forever debated (never trusted). The statement "trust the science" is meant to confuse people, because science is intrinsically not trustable, but debatable.
I have an actual theory that says the same thing. It has substantial evidence to support it.
Within that evidence there is none that supports the claims or fears of infertility.