Ronald Bernard has been telling his story for a few years now. His credentials are verified and he is very much who he says he is with the commensurate bonafides. As to the events he has described, the first thing you must ask yourself is what would he gain by lying? The eternal enmity of the richest and most powerful people in the world? Death threats and gangstalking? To have sacrificed the opportunity to stand with the ruling class and be counted among their number for a lifetime of constantly defending your deeds and words to morons who don't possess the brainpower to grasp what his claims imply seems like a really stupid choice made by an extremely intelligent man...unless he is telling the truth.
Yes Iโve watched/listened to him before as well. Good question what would he have to gain and what did he have to lose, almost his life. I believed this man even before watching this!
It is possible to argue against all types of evidence. However, imagine you were on a jury and you listened to all his evidence. Would you believe him or not?
Does his story make sense or is it riddled with inconsistencies? Is his evidence way out there or have many other people said similar things in the past?
Assuming you decide to believe him, would you be troubled by the fact that some in the financial world thought it was OK to ritually kill children for their own gratification or not?
Ronald Bernard has been telling his story for a few years now. His credentials are verified and he is very much who he says he is with the commensurate bonafides. As to the events he has described, the first thing you must ask yourself is what would he gain by lying? The eternal enmity of the richest and most powerful people in the world? Death threats and gangstalking? To have sacrificed the opportunity to stand with the ruling class and be counted among their number for a lifetime of constantly defending your deeds and words to morons who don't possess the brainpower to grasp what his claims imply seems like a really stupid choice made by an extremely intelligent man...unless he is telling the truth.
Yes Iโve watched/listened to him before as well. Good question what would he have to gain and what did he have to lose, almost his life. I believed this man even before watching this!
The first question is: what substance has he really told.
He has confirmed that the financial elites are into child sacrifice. That is quite a good start.
Has he? Has he really? Who is he? How do you know? So, what is the value of his "confirmation"?
What is the value of this? For whom?
It is possible to argue against all types of evidence. However, imagine you were on a jury and you listened to all his evidence. Would you believe him or not?
Does his story make sense or is it riddled with inconsistencies? Is his evidence way out there or have many other people said similar things in the past?
Assuming you decide to believe him, would you be troubled by the fact that some in the financial world thought it was OK to ritually kill children for their own gratification or not?