I don't really speak for the sub. I just do some modding for them when I'm over there. I can only speak for myself.
I agree that the world has some very corrupt, evil, and powerful people in it. That's not at all challenging to believe. Nor is it even difficult to believe some of those people are/could be pedophiles. This isn't a challenging position to hold, and I think a lot of liberals would agree.
If Q was SOLELY about being anti-pedophile or anti-corruption, you'd have a much more diverse group of members around here.
But it's not that. From the outside, Q honestly just feels like an attempt to create a narrative in which Donald Trump can be this strategic 5D-chess playing genius, but never actually demonstrate any clear evidence that he IS one. Instead, he plays optics, "weak when you are strong" type stuff, while a faceless entity who this board curiously refuses to ever identify is the actual brains behind the operation. And no, you haven't lost the election, it just LOOKS that way, because the operation being used to save the world is so immensely complex and secret that only the smartest of us can actually see what's really happening.
If I were going to "speak for the sub", I would imagine that would be the message. That Q seems like an extremely complicated version of "Bernie can still win" memes. People who refuse to believe that Donald Trump was capable of being as disliked as he would need to be to legitimately lose the election to someone as boring as Joe Biden and to present the kind of optics that plagued him for his entire Presidency.
It can't be the result of Trump's promises and boasts being presented as a far more valuable currency than he had the resources to back up. It must be something far more subtle and complicated.
I personally don't think most of you are significantly divergent from the average population in intelligence. I can't speak to your education levels because I don't know. I also don't think you're necessarily crazy. I think the psychology of what it takes to believe in something like Q is enormously more complicated than almost anyone here or on the outside actually believes, and that's what I'm interested in understanding.
I don't really speak for the sub. I just do some modding for them when I'm over there. I can only speak for myself.
I agree that the world has some very corrupt, evil, and powerful people in it. That's not at all challenging to believe. Nor is it even difficult to believe some of those people are/could be pedophiles. This isn't a challenging position to hold, and I think a lot of liberals would agree.
If Q was SOLELY about being anti-pedophile or anti-corruption, you'd have a much more diverse group of members around here.
But it's not that. From the outside, Q honestly just feels like an attempt to create a narrative in which Donald Trump can be this strategic 5D-chess playing genius, but never actually demonstrate any clear evidence that he IS one. Instead, he plays optics, "weak when you are strong" type stuff, while a faceless entity who this board curiously refuses to ever identify is the actual brains behind the operation. And no, you haven't lost the election, it just LOOKS that way, because the operation being used to save the world is so immensely complex and secret that only the smartest of us can actually see what's really happening.
If I were going to "speak for the sub", I would imagine that would be the message. That Q seems like an extremely complicated version of "Bernie can still win" memes. People who refuse to believe that Donald Trump was capable of being as disliked as he would need to be to legitimately lose the election to someone as boring as Joe Biden and to present the kind of optics that plagued him for his entire Presidency.
It can't be the result of Trump's promises and boasts being presented as a far more valuable currency than he had the resources to back up. It must be something far more subtle and complicated.
I personally don't think most of you are significantly divergent from the average population in intelligence. I can't speak to your education levels because I don't know. I also don't think you're necessarily crazy. I think the psychology of what it takes to believe in something like Q is enormously more complicated than almost anyone here or on the outside actually believes, and that's what I'm interested in understanding.
Thanks for your input. If you'd like I can give you my perspective and why I am here, and my personal take on Q. Just LMK.