We need to move away from demanding credentials. Anyone presenting facts and evidence that can be backed up with data and shown to be accurate by research and analysis has presented a legitimate argument.
Demanding some kind of credential bee associated to the presenter before we accept the information and analysis as important or true is frankly idiotic.
By requiring credentials, we are falling for the game of academia run by the deep state that would decieve the people. The actual data and evidence gets side stepped and replaced with first whether your presenter is credentialed (by their system) to be allowed to know what he is presenting. Second it sets up the equally stupid game of lining up their credentialed people against your credentialed presenter and discrediting the presenter based on a reductive count of who has the most credentialed people supporting their position.
In both of these scenarios, the requirement of credentials before reviewing evidences presented removes the actual data from consideration in what is presented. We all lose by default because nobody sees the data.
Stop demanding credentials and instead learn to think critically, do your own research and analysis, and determine for yourself if the presenter has backed up what is claimed with actual data and correctly analysed and drawn conclusion from said data.
If we do not take responsibility for our own knowledge and understanding, we will be doomed to be controlled by whomever controls the assignment of credentials and controls the credentialed with their money or power.
We need to move away from demanding credentials. Anyone presenting facts and evidence that can be backed up with data and shown to be accurate by research and analysis has presented a legitimate argument.
Demanding some kind of credential bee associated to the presenter before we accept the information and analysis as important or true is frankly idiotic.
By requiring credentials, we are falling for the game of academia run by the deep state that would decieve the people. The actual data and evidence gets side stepped and replaced with first whether your presenter is credentialed (by their system) to be allowed to know what he is presenting. Second it sets up the equally stupid game of lining up their credentialed people against your credentialed presenter and discrediting the presenter based on a reductive count of who has the most credentialed people supporting their position.
In both of these scenarios, the requirement of credentials before reviewing evidences presented removes the actual data from consideration in what is presented. We all lose by default because nobody sees the data.
Stop demanding credentials and instead learn to think critically, do your own research and analysis, and determine for yourself if the presenter has backed up what is claimed with actual data and correctly analysed and drawn conclusion from said data.
If we do not take responsibility for our own knowledge and understanding, we will be doomed to be controlled by whomever controls the assignment of credentials and controls the credentialed with their money or power.