I had seen an interview with a CDC? official where he bragged how when Trump wanted monoclonal antibodies developed, this guy said they purposefully made it an EUA so they could make some rules, and then required it only be given after admittance to the hospital.....if it rings a bell for anyone...thanks.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (3)
sorted by:
How is this hindering them?
What would be the proper way to do it?
I don't know much about them, but these were experimental recently right?
You joined 11 hours ago....very suspect, no offense.
The vaccines are experimental too....just because something is “approved” doesn’t mean it is not a new, and “experimental” technology.
Monoclonal antibodies are not experimental, they have been used for many things for years. They are most useful IF used right away, if you have to wait until hospital admittance, it is likely too late and undermines the treatment and the welfare of the patient.
I know that mRNA had been around a while, but I didn't know about monoclonal antibodies. But looking at Regernon now which is the stuff POTUS got in Oct. It was experimental then, definitely new stuff they were combining things they never combined before. The FDA emergency use came in November
In Jan 2021 when POTUS went to Mar A Lago, they were still in trials on using their stuff on nonhospitalized patients. In May they presented the findings of their trial showing it reduces hospitalization and it is currently authorized pre-hospitalization.
So they did the needed testing. I'm not sure I see an issue.