I've been a little suspicious at how many Anti-vax personalities have been reporting recent cases of COVID. (Just remembering all the natural medicine doctors who were killed over the past few years.)
Whatever the REAL 'virus' is, they aerosolised it in early 2020 and released it in the major cities that were first to report the 'pandemic' - China, New York, Italy.
I had forgotten about that, I think in China they were saying it was an alcohol mist to kill off the virus or something like that. After what I've learned, most definitely not a helpful aerosol.
They needed the videos of people 'dropping down in the streets' early on to convince everyone it was a 'pandemic'. Once they couldn't match that to people simply looking around them in their everyday experience and thinking "hang on, I'm not seeing this", they dropped it. But by then, the damage was done.
Just listened to a video that discussed a woman in British Columbia who went to a well-publicized protest. A plane flew overhead and after the protest a lot of people got sick with something.
I tried to study this "germ theory vs. terrain theory" as much as I could, but I still could not rectify the terrain theory against what I've experienced throughout my life, and how certain aspects of germ theory seem to make better sense.
Care to share convincing links that perhaps I haven't found as of yet?
Thank you very much for the link. I read JustSayit's posts, and he brings up the most difficult issue I have with terrain theory. He mentioned measles, and nothing I read about terrain theory explains highly communicable disease, aside from saying that all the people who come down with those identical symptoms are all being exposed to the same toxins...resulting in identical symptoms. That just doesn't jive with what is observed with respect to outbreaks, at least the most serious ones.
OK, so I picked up on my study of this again, because I'd really like to resolve it one way or another in my head! This is the best discussion I found, and it comes at the argument from a slightly different direction, that of investigating outbreaks in the distant past where human populations were more discrete, and not contaminated by travel. If I understand correctly, what you are saying, and this article, is that dangerous bacteria and viruses are always present in our bodies, and not spread from one individual to another. It's environmental factors that induce these pathogens to get out of control: https://lordchewy.medium.com/pandemics-explained-by-terrain-theory-2181182fb404
I'm still hung up on the smallpox epidemic supposedly brought to the American Indians by the Europeans. Why didn't the Europeans get sick, too, if the "inducer" was environmental?
Thanks so much for your help. I thought the micro-clotting was due to Remdesivir and/or the vaccines. I'm still having trouble figuring this all out...
I've been a little suspicious at how many Anti-vax personalities have been reporting recent cases of COVID. (Just remembering all the natural medicine doctors who were killed over the past few years.)
Whatever the REAL 'virus' is, they aerosolised it in early 2020 and released it in the major cities that were first to report the 'pandemic' - China, New York, Italy.
I had forgotten about that, I think in China they were saying it was an alcohol mist to kill off the virus or something like that. After what I've learned, most definitely not a helpful aerosol.
They needed the videos of people 'dropping down in the streets' early on to convince everyone it was a 'pandemic'. Once they couldn't match that to people simply looking around them in their everyday experience and thinking "hang on, I'm not seeing this", they dropped it. But by then, the damage was done.
Most people are indeed stupid.
Just listened to a video that discussed a woman in British Columbia who went to a well-publicized protest. A plane flew overhead and after the protest a lot of people got sick with something.
Wonder if it was aerosol or they spiked water bottles or something.
Likely aerosol or spreading a toxin on things that would be touched, so people get it into their nose, mouth and eyes.
I tried to study this "germ theory vs. terrain theory" as much as I could, but I still could not rectify the terrain theory against what I've experienced throughout my life, and how certain aspects of germ theory seem to make better sense.
Care to share convincing links that perhaps I haven't found as of yet?
Thank you very much for the link. I read JustSayit's posts, and he brings up the most difficult issue I have with terrain theory. He mentioned measles, and nothing I read about terrain theory explains highly communicable disease, aside from saying that all the people who come down with those identical symptoms are all being exposed to the same toxins...resulting in identical symptoms. That just doesn't jive with what is observed with respect to outbreaks, at least the most serious ones.
OK, so I picked up on my study of this again, because I'd really like to resolve it one way or another in my head! This is the best discussion I found, and it comes at the argument from a slightly different direction, that of investigating outbreaks in the distant past where human populations were more discrete, and not contaminated by travel. If I understand correctly, what you are saying, and this article, is that dangerous bacteria and viruses are always present in our bodies, and not spread from one individual to another. It's environmental factors that induce these pathogens to get out of control: https://lordchewy.medium.com/pandemics-explained-by-terrain-theory-2181182fb404
I'm still hung up on the smallpox epidemic supposedly brought to the American Indians by the Europeans. Why didn't the Europeans get sick, too, if the "inducer" was environmental?
Thanks so much for your help. I thought the micro-clotting was due to Remdesivir and/or the vaccines. I'm still having trouble figuring this all out...
Please explain rabies.