2
bcfromfl 2 points ago +2 / -0

OK...I'm slow sometimes. Could someone tell me what popcorn means, other than something you eat watching a movie?

12
bcfromfl 12 points ago +13 / -1

Comments in this thread basically prove what I knew this movie would accomplish. It only proves what we already knew, and those who don't believe won't be convinced.

3
bcfromfl 3 points ago +3 / -0

Clickbait. It was one flight, because a few Jews didn't comply with the mask ordinance. The Jews got nasty and started throwing insults...police responded.

3
bcfromfl 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump can't take credit for the equity markets soaring even further into no-man's land...that was due to the Federal Reserve, QE ad infinitum, corporate share buybacks, insanely low margin requirements, and other manipulations.

If you remember back when Trump was campaigning in 2015, he said something to the effect, "The stock market is in the biggest bubble I've ever seen."

15
bcfromfl 15 points ago +15 / -0

A young child would see this frightening/adversarial situation and automatically take the side of the mother. Any "educational moment" would be superseded by the confrontational aspect, and the mother would be sure to reinforce her position against the "crazy person" later.

I see this as a "lose-lose" situation.

21
bcfromfl 21 points ago +23 / -2

In the scenario you just described, unfortunately, there is no possible way you could have intervened with a positive outcome. Some things you just have to shrug your shoulders and ignore as best you can, and turn it over to God.

3
bcfromfl 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting -- thanks. I imagine it's not a requirement to insure your livestock, so, in those cases, farmers have a lot to lose!

3
bcfromfl 3 points ago +3 / -0

A bit off-topic, but I'm curious what the insurance payouts are for farmers when they have to cull their livestock? Is the payout based upon their investment thus far, or is it based upon the end-value of the livestock when it hits the market? How much difference is there, between the payout vs. what they would have received if the livestock made it?

6
bcfromfl 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've been trying to find what her advance was from the publisher, and also McCain's. This is the shady stuff where they receive big payments...none of these politicians/bigwigs care about how many copies are sold.

1
bcfromfl 1 point ago +2 / -1

I can't know this, of course, but it appears your understanding of events is from Jewish-inspired sources...all contaminated by propaganda.

It's possible Germany could have used captured French trucks as cover for Operation Barbarossa, although I am not familiar with this particular claim.

I also am not aware of the claims of Hitler breaking his word to other leaders. I DO know, however, that Hitler gave Poland months of warnings when ethnic Germans were being tortured and executed within Poland's borders. Poland did this to egg Germany into invading, because they had just made a protectionist agreement with Britain, that Britain would come to their aid, as well as give them reparation monies in the event of an attack.

Similarly, Hitler begged Churchill for several weeks, to stop Britain's bombing campaign against German civilian targets. Churchill broke international agreements by doing so. What was happening was the War was winding down, and Germany was no closer to being crushed like Churchill wanted. He knew if he could get Hitler to bomb London, that he could convince FDR to commit American troops. Churchill is more to blame for the London bombings than Hitler.

There are few, single, more horrific acts of war than the firebombing of Dresden. Yet, we rarely hear about it. More people died in Dresden than Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. There were NO military targets in Dresden, yet Churchill, FDR, and Eisenhower leveled the city, as well as many, many other targets. Where was the justification for this? By doing so, the bombing absolutely obliterated Germany's infrastructure, and ability to maintain food and medical services to the camps. When the Allies arrived, they blamed the horrible condition at the camps on the Germans, when it was their own fault. It's all spin, and propaganda.

Eisenhower intentionally changed the classification of German military prisoners so he could avoid following the laws of the Geneva Convention. German soldiers were treated worse than animals, starved, tortured, and executed.

So, I find there are many, many more reasons to call Stalin, Churchill, and FDR war criminals (as well as Eisenhower), than Hitler. Most of the ethnic peoples in Europe at the time, loved Hitler, because they saw him as the only obstacle in the way of communism.

2
bcfromfl 2 points ago +3 / -1

I've only seen a single newspaper clipping about that alleged Rothschild arrest...in a Zionist newspaper. If you are privy to more details about that than I am, then perhaps you know more. But given that the single clipping is all we seem to know about the alleged event, again, take it with a grain of salt.

Germany did invade supposedly "neutral" countries in an effort to stave off advances from both the East and the West, however, aside from isolated events, didn't destroy said countries in a blind, rabid rage as has been attributed to them. Invading Switzerland would have done nothing for Germany, because, 1) Switzerland was neutral, with many ethnic Germans living there, and 2) the bankers, even if they were captured, wouldn't have access to the monies they stole. Hitler knew that the bankers held allegiance to no country, so, there was no point in attacking a whole country for the sins of a red shield family.

As far as Germany "pillaging" other countries, this is Zionist drivel.

2
bcfromfl 2 points ago +3 / -1

If you know a lot about Hitler and Germany, I'm assuming you've also considered the content here: https://ww2truth.com/europa-the-last-battle/ and here: https://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/ ?

If you have more to criticize about Hitler than to give him credit, then I think you should spend more time looking at it from a different angle.

I have seen very little, aside from a couple of links, referring to what you suggest about Himmler. Since there is so little about this, and yet so MUCH evidence that Germany was much more honorable than Russia, Britain, or the U.S., I take it with a grain of salt. It's quite possible that this satanic reference may be part of the Zionist propaganda.

0
bcfromfl 0 points ago +4 / -4

If you're referring to the "propaganda" effort during the war, there's a misconception that propaganda is always bad. Nowadays, that is true, but during the war, the propaganda coming from the Zionists and bolsheviks was so evil, Germany had propaganda efforts to counteract the negativity, and remind the German civlians what they were fighting for.

Be careful where you're getting your info about The Third Reich. Hitler raised the country practically from the ashes as a result of WWI and the Weimar Republic, in just a few short years, while the rest of the world was dealing with a global depression. That's quite an accomplishment.

2
bcfromfl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, his channel is PioneerPauly, and he's a gold prospector in British Columbia. People tease him about it occasionally, but that's not why he's popular.

1
bcfromfl 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not uncommon for people to have long canines. There's a very popular YouTuber with this feature.

1
bcfromfl 1 point ago +1 / -0

2009...

4
bcfromfl 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is precisely the reason I have no interest whatsoever in watching 2000 Mules. I don't need to see any more evidence how it was done, and, in fact, watching more "new" evidence is just going to infuriate me more. Until someone, somewhere, does their job and we see some arrests, I'll spend my time and money on other things.

1
bcfromfl 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're talking about the Gulags. I don't know a lot about them, but I suspect there wasn't much else being done by the prisoners than farming.

The purpose of WWII was to crush Germany for kicking the bankers and Freemasons out of the country...and then to collect the spoils afterwards. It is now known that there were Soviet bolshevik agents working in the FDR administration.

1
bcfromfl 1 point ago +1 / -0

What history books won't tell you is that WWII was actually winding down, and Churchill wasn't getting the result he wanted...getting America into the War and crushing Germany. He knew the only way to get the outrage he wanted was for Germany to bomb London. So the way he did it was to violate international treaty and begin bombing German civilian targets. Hitler practically begged him for several weeks to stop. That's what started the London air raids, and America entered the arena soon after.

FDR did the same trick with Pearl Harbor. They backed Japan into a corner, with no other way out than for them to attack. His intelligence told him in advance what Japan was planning, yet he said nothing publicly (nor prepared Pearl Harbor) because he wanted the attack to sway public opinion about participating in the War.

1
bcfromfl 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have a massive covid/vax file, full of medical research, articles, etc. Unfortunately, I am not aware of any CREDIBLE treatment post-vax. If your friend was unlucky enough to receive one of the tainted batches instead of saline, I can understand the concerns. There are a number of websites pushing stuff like dandelion, pine needle, star anise, and other extracts...which may have utility for infections and spike protein transmission/shedding. But, what happens as a result of mRNA injection is, as is understood at the moment, a permanent alteration of one's immune system. There are a number of mechanisms which defy understanding yet, like the strange, stringy and elastic clots which are behind a number of troubling symptoms.

If anyone refers you to the Zelenkow protocol...that's for natural treatment of infection...not post-vax.

I'm sorry I can't offer any hope. But I think it's better to face the reality, and not go on a wild goose chase after snake oil.

view more: Next ›