You are absolutely correct. The “no liability” clause refers to civil liability, not criminal, and even in the civil realm it is not absolute. If they are shown to have deliberately and knowingly introduced a harmful product or actively covered up the danger after acquiring knowledge, they will be liable, both civilly and criminally. This will take a long time to play out and many will suffer but too many are in too deep to back out now.
You are absolutely correct. The “no liability” clause refers to civil liability, not criminal, and even in the civil realm it is not absolute. If they are shown to have deliberately and knowingly introduced a harmful product or actively covered up the danger after acquiring knowledge, they will be liable, both civilly and criminally. This will take a long time to play out and many will suffer but too many are in too deep to back out now.