I haven't seen much posted about any clinical studies for using Remdesivir for Covid, specifically. Since it is the "standard of care" in most hospitals (due to demands from NIH), we should know if there is any SCIENCE to back up these mandates.
I found a couple of interesting studies.
(1) This one used Remdesivir in one group and placebo in another group. The only real analysis was how long it took the patient to get out of the hospital or moved out of the Covid wing of the hospital to another area of the hospital. This is subjective, to say the least.
The only real difference was the group who got the drug were "cleared" in 10 days, and the group who got nothing were "cleared" in 15 days.
They then went on to do a COMPUTER MODEL to claim that Remdesivir would "likely" lead to better outcomes regarding recovery and avoiding death. But they have no evidence of this. It's just a computer model.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764
(2) This one is a review of multiple studies for Remdesivir, and then they arrived at conclusions based on what they saw overall in the group of studies.
Based on the currently available evidence, we are moderately certain that remdesivir probably has little or no effect on all-cause mortality at up to day 28 in hospitalised adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection. [This means: It does NOT prevent people from dying.]
We are uncertain about the effects of remdesivir on clinical improvement and worsening. [This means that the review of MULTIPLE studies show NO benefit.]
There were insufficient data available to validly examine the effect of remdesivir on mortality in subgroups depending on the extent of respiratory support at baseline. [This means that not enough evidence exists to determine if Remdesivir is either safe or effective for "sub-groups" (elderly, children, pregnant women).]
Bottom line: Remdesivir is NOT proven effective in providing ANY benefit to SARS-CoV-2/Covid 19 patients.
Science!
You didn't respond to my question.
Where is the clinical evidence that Remdesivir is safe and effective for use in SARS-CoV-2 patients?
This is demanded of those who advocate for Ivermectin and HCQ.
We should also demand it, then, from those like you who adovate for Remdesivir.
Where are the studies?
And YOU can't have it both ways. The medical industry wants to claim that ONLY clinical trials are valid evidence of anything, and anecdotal evidence means nothing.
Until it is convenient for them to switch sides.
You don't get to have it both was.
WHERE ARE THE STUDIES?
You are the one claiming to be in the medical field, and you are prescribing a drug that appears to have NO scientific basis as to safety or effectiveness to be used in Covid 19 patients.
YOU are the one with the burden of proof here, and YOU are the one who has failed to provide any.
I'm not the one giving a dangerous drug to people without knowing anything about it.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
Still waiting for you to show me proof.
In the meantime, watch this.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Chf8zg6Fl1fS/
Jesus!
Those are BOTH the SAME study -- and they are the SAME study I cited in my OP.
Clearly, you just found something and posted it.
You have NO IDEA what it says or does not say.
Serious questions: Are you actually a medical doctor or nurse, and do you not know how to read a study?