I haven't seen much posted about any clinical studies for using Remdesivir for Covid, specifically. Since it is the "standard of care" in most hospitals (due to demands from NIH), we should know if there is any SCIENCE to back up these mandates.
I found a couple of interesting studies.
(1) This one used Remdesivir in one group and placebo in another group. The only real analysis was how long it took the patient to get out of the hospital or moved out of the Covid wing of the hospital to another area of the hospital. This is subjective, to say the least.
The only real difference was the group who got the drug were "cleared" in 10 days, and the group who got nothing were "cleared" in 15 days.
They then went on to do a COMPUTER MODEL to claim that Remdesivir would "likely" lead to better outcomes regarding recovery and avoiding death. But they have no evidence of this. It's just a computer model.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764
(2) This one is a review of multiple studies for Remdesivir, and then they arrived at conclusions based on what they saw overall in the group of studies.
Based on the currently available evidence, we are moderately certain that remdesivir probably has little or no effect on all-cause mortality at up to day 28 in hospitalised adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection. [This means: It does NOT prevent people from dying.]
We are uncertain about the effects of remdesivir on clinical improvement and worsening. [This means that the review of MULTIPLE studies show NO benefit.]
There were insufficient data available to validly examine the effect of remdesivir on mortality in subgroups depending on the extent of respiratory support at baseline. [This means that not enough evidence exists to determine if Remdesivir is either safe or effective for "sub-groups" (elderly, children, pregnant women).]
Bottom line: Remdesivir is NOT proven effective in providing ANY benefit to SARS-CoV-2/Covid 19 patients.
Science!
No, YOU are the one ordering the prescriptions for a drug that you have NO scientific studies to support.
Which is it?
"Evidence based medicine" is about EVIDENCE (i.e. clinical trials) ... or it is about anecdotal stories?
If anecdotal, then HCQ/Ivermectin wins, hands down.
If ONLY clinical trials are considered evidence -- and that is EXACTLY the case with the American medical industry -- then why do YOU not have ANY such evidence?
Dude, that is the SAME DAMN STUDY I POSTED IN MY OP!
You're god damned right I have been confronational with YOU, not with other people.
You claim to be a "medical professional" and you have NO FUCKING IDEA WHAT YOUR ARE DOING!
You are prescribing a drug that you know NOTHING about ...
And now you prove you can't read a damn study about that drug!
All you did was post different links to the same study I cited in my OP.
If you are an example of the medical industry today, it's no wonder people like Fauci can lead you around by the nose.
FOLLOW ORDERS! That's all you seem to understand.
I feel sorry for the people you treat. They have no idea they are putting their trust into the hands of a quack.
And you really don't even seem to give a shit.