It would be just like Trump to focus everyone's attention on AZ, meanwhile other states are uncovering the fraud through other means, preparing to drop it all at once.
Interesting timing that Lindell is starting to talk about taking his case to the Supreme Court again isn't it?
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public schools Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.
However:
original jurisdiction is of so delicate and grave a character that it was not contemplated that it would be exercised save when the necessity was absolute." Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U. S. 1, 15 (1900).
Removing the POTUS seems like such a delicate and grave question that could only be resolved by the SCOTUS.
It would be just like Trump to focus everyone's attention on AZ, meanwhile other states are uncovering the fraud through other means, preparing to drop it all at once.
Interesting timing that Lindell is starting to talk about taking his case to the Supreme Court again isn't it?
Please forgive my ignorance, frens.
But I didn’t think it was possible to be able to take a case directly to the Supreme Court.
When I saw that post about Mike, I was sorta perplexed.
Maybe some pede lawyers can set me straight
However:
Removing the POTUS seems like such a delicate and grave question that could only be resolved by the SCOTUS.