Wonder if Jan 6 was a important date back in history. Who knows, maybe just a shower thought. - The Great Awakening

Wonder if Jan 6 was a important date back in history. Who knows, maybe just a shower thought. (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 3 years ago by Lurking_Waiting 3 years ago by Lurking_Waiting +31 / -0

3 comments download

3 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (3)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– Suzeq2018 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I haven't looked into that, but I do know George Washington's 2nd Inaugural address was only 126 words. 01/06/21 mirrored is 126010- notice the 126 & 1260

his code name was Agent 711, so I'm guessing a reference to #17-connection to Q since JFK Jr. named his magazine after him, AND his spot at Mt. Rushmore is marked 17 instead of 1 and MR is in Keystone SD, with an elevation of 1745 meters...too many connections. (Mt. Rushmore was also on the cover of JFK jr. survival guide to the future in 1997)

and John Quincy Adams was a part of the Anti-Freemason party, so assume the white-hats back then were using some type of code.

--1260 is also an important number in the Bible.https://www.gotquestions.org/prophecy-1260-days-Revelation.html

AND

go to 2:40 in this video, JRK jr. talks about GW's speech and 126 words. I've watched the majority of his videos/interviews, and he drops a lot of Q crumbs, so I do think he did this on purpose, to put the number 126 out there...

https://www.c-span.org/video/?123621-1/washington-college-commencement-speech

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q