IMO, doctors are responsible and, in the end, will be held liable.
Their job is to research and make sure what they're giving people is safe. They are being willfully ignorant and not doing their most basic due diligence. Imagine if an IT director decided to implement a security product that, after a basic web search, has proven it's actually a trojan horse and installed it on every computer in the company. You'd definitely question motive and, at the least bit, would be fired.
A computer and a company is far less valuable than a single human life. Yet they're not doing even the most basic research.
IMO, doctors are responsible and, in the end, will be held liable.
Their job is to research and make sure what they're giving people is safe. They are being willfully ignorant and not doing their most basic due diligence. Imagine if an IT director decided to implement a security product that, after a basic web search, has proven it's actually a trojan horse and installed it on every computer in the company. You'd definitely question motive and, at the least bit, would be fired.
A computer and a company is far less valuable than a single human life. Yet they're not doing even the most basic research.
Their job is to follow guidelines that are created by "experts".
And by experts, I mean "pharmaceutical companies"