Idk man. People are making up the comm rules as they go. Sometimes it's the timestamp of Scavino tweets, sometimes it's the video length. Sometimes it's from another twitter account altogether.
"5:5" means loud and clear, that is well-known jargon alright, which we can all agree upon.
"0:55" is another matter entirely.
My point is it doesn't make any sense to arbitrarily drop a zero then push the : sign forward just because it fits nicely and conveniently with a timecode.
5:5 really is "loud and clear", whereas 0:55 really is just an arbitrary and random time mark.
It can't. That's my point, friend. That "5:5" isn't related to "0:55" in any way shape or form, other than it looking aesthetically similar. It's an arbitrary connection. It's like saying a power outlet symbolizes a pig's nose - it doesn't, they just look similar.
Idk man. People are making up the comm rules as they go. Sometimes it's the timestamp of Scavino tweets, sometimes it's the video length. Sometimes it's from another twitter account altogether.
5:5 is established even by Q. It means "loud and clear". No, it's not a "made up" comm. It's very well known.
"5:5" means loud and clear, that is well-known jargon alright, which we can all agree upon.
"0:55" is another matter entirely.
My point is it doesn't make any sense to arbitrarily drop a zero then push the : sign forward just because it fits nicely and conveniently with a timecode.
5:5 really is "loud and clear", whereas 0:55 really is just an arbitrary and random time mark.
It can mean both and in this case would make sense.
The storm is upon Loud and clear.
It can't. That's my point, friend. That "5:5" isn't related to "0:55" in any way shape or form, other than it looking aesthetically similar. It's an arbitrary connection. It's like saying a power outlet symbolizes a pig's nose - it doesn't, they just look similar.