You forgot to complete the sentence: "Will you make a post about the other 38 men's singles tennis players who got the jab in the last month that did not have negative effects YET?"
Even with the "yet" correction you're rather missing the point, I think.
What is the risk of death or permanent injury to a healthy 34 year old man who contracts COVID? Do you know that information or do you just choose to ignore it?
Let's pretend you know what his risk of injury or death from COVID is. What happens when that healthy 34 year old man contracts COVID and is then treated early with Ivermectin? Do you know what his new risk number is?
What human with any level of intelligence or self preservation instinct would willingly allow someone to inject them with an entirely experimental drug - one that skipped animal testing and that had a history of all the animals dying in prior test studies with similar products - unless NOT taking that unknown risky injection would put them in exceptionally high levels of imminent danger of death or permanent disability?
This should not be as hard a decision as some people are making it. This is 1000% about virtue signaling and 0% about rational thought processes.
*yet.
You forgot to complete the sentence: "Will you make a post about the other 38 men's singles tennis players who got the jab in the last month that did not have negative effects YET?"
Even with the "yet" correction you're rather missing the point, I think.
What is the risk of death or permanent injury to a healthy 34 year old man who contracts COVID? Do you know that information or do you just choose to ignore it?
Let's pretend you know what his risk of injury or death from COVID is. What happens when that healthy 34 year old man contracts COVID and is then treated early with Ivermectin? Do you know what his new risk number is?
What human with any level of intelligence or self preservation instinct would willingly allow someone to inject them with an entirely experimental drug - one that skipped animal testing and that had a history of all the animals dying in prior test studies with similar products - unless NOT taking that unknown risky injection would put them in exceptionally high levels of imminent danger of death or permanent disability?
This should not be as hard a decision as some people are making it. This is 1000% about virtue signaling and 0% about rational thought processes.