I've clued in to how he forms arguments, and he intentionally creates logical back-doors to his arguments that allow for their destruction.
That is to say, every argument he forms sounds really good and based, but he is using techniques of Sophism to undermine his own conservative talking points and hand winning debates to any of his "foes" that he's informed ahead of time.
If he truly has flipped to the good guys, I'd be happy, but for right now I'm suspicious of this push and even more suspicious that YouTube would even let him.
He's controlled opposition, and until he admits it that's how I'll treat him.
Exactly. It's a pathetic sleight of hand, how he argues. And it is very sus how they let this ad through. Wasn't he for it not too long ago, anyway? So why the change?
I'm wary of Shapiro.
I've clued in to how he forms arguments, and he intentionally creates logical back-doors to his arguments that allow for their destruction.
That is to say, every argument he forms sounds really good and based, but he is using techniques of Sophism to undermine his own conservative talking points and hand winning debates to any of his "foes" that he's informed ahead of time.
If he truly has flipped to the good guys, I'd be happy, but for right now I'm suspicious of this push and even more suspicious that YouTube would even let him.
He's controlled opposition, and until he admits it that's how I'll treat him.
Exactly. It's a pathetic sleight of hand, how he argues. And it is very sus how they let this ad through. Wasn't he for it not too long ago, anyway? So why the change?
He's pro vax but anti mandate.
“It is incredibly irresponsible for Trump not to concede. No evidence of fraud” - Ben said that, a few days after the heist.
Correct.
He's going to ride the razors edge of what he has to say to keep his audience.
Saying he is a "hero" I disagree with.
If he is backing the vaccines, still, he's willfully hurting people.