I also noticed that the cameramen all have matching lenses. There is no way this is organic, because all photographers have gear they prefer, often to an obsessive degree. No way you'd find a group they are all uses matching lenses. They are props
Well, you would typically be right, but for a setting like this a Canon 70-200L F2.8 is the way to go. There's only one with a different one, but it is also a Canon L lens. Could be a 28-300. Not sure.
What surprises me more is that they are all using the ET-87 lens hood, which is not standard on the 70-200L lens.
Canon doesn't make an off-white hood for that lens, so I that means most bought a generic off-white from China? No. Those are also not off-white Canons, they are light silver Sony Master G lenses, 70-200 f2.8 on Alpha a9 bodies (exactly the ones Xiden's press corp uses)This was an in-house production with the photos falsely attributed to Reuters, AP, etc.
I also noticed that the cameramen all have matching lenses. There is no way this is organic, because all photographers have gear they prefer, often to an obsessive degree. No way you'd find a group they are all uses matching lenses. They are props
Well, you would typically be right, but for a setting like this a Canon 70-200L F2.8 is the way to go. There's only one with a different one, but it is also a Canon L lens. Could be a 28-300. Not sure.
What surprises me more is that they are all using the ET-87 lens hood, which is not standard on the 70-200L lens.
Canon doesn't make an off-white hood for that lens, so I that means most bought a generic off-white from China? No. Those are also not off-white Canons, they are light silver Sony Master G lenses, 70-200 f2.8 on Alpha a9 bodies (exactly the ones Xiden's press corp uses)This was an in-house production with the photos falsely attributed to Reuters, AP, etc.
Good point, I thought that was strange also.