Nah, it is lazy. It's a lazy way to live. You are lazy. Your name on this board is lazy and obvious, and your shilling is lazy. Be better. Stop being lazy.
As for the LGBTQ people, judgement is God's, not mine or yours. The same judgement you mete out, the same you will receive, and it'd be a tough pill to swallow for the omnipotent father to censure you for hating and condemning any of his children without repentance and remorse.
Here's my response to your "blindly rejecting the vaccine is safe" position.
Blindly rejecting the vax, or anything without data or concrete reasons, is lazy. That's not what we do here.
If you're gonna reject something, do it with gusteau, and for a concrete reason.
The vaccines aren't being rejected for the sake of those with adverse reactions, though for many that may be reason enough, but because the data doesn't make sense. Pouring over the numbers is telling us that in the case of the "safe and effective" vaccines, they are in fact neither safe, nor effective.
mRNA codon vaccine technology is experimental. Before now, it was extensively researched, and rejected for human trials not once, not blindly, but for very concrete reasons. The Inventor of the process himself is an advocate against receiving this medical product. So, safety issues abound.
The effectiveness is then in question. After all, according to the FDA and CDC, the immunized population is not immune, not less likely to spread COVID when they have it, or to not die if they catch it. But it may reduce severity if you'd end up in the hospital. So it reduces severity of symptoms, like Tylenol for a fever.
So the vaccine isn't an effective vaccine, or even a vaccine at all. It's a prophylactic treatment against the severity of COVID, and a risky one at that in the face of a good ol tube of ivermectin.
That's a logical position on why it's rejected. Concrete, potentially flawed, but not lazy.
Tldr: the vaccine is rejected because it claims to be safe and effective. The preliminary data strongly suggests otherwise, and people can read. It's not done blindly except by lazy people. Numbers and data sourced from CDC, vaers, and FDA.
Nah, it is lazy. It's a lazy way to live. You are lazy. Your name on this board is lazy and obvious, and your shilling is lazy. Be better. Stop being lazy.
As for the LGBTQ people, judgement is God's, not mine or yours. The same judgement you mete out, the same you will receive, and it'd be a tough pill to swallow for the omnipotent father to censure you for hating and condemning any of his children without repentance and remorse.
Here's my response to your "blindly rejecting the vaccine is safe" position.
Blindly rejecting the vax, or anything without data or concrete reasons, is lazy. That's not what we do here.
If you're gonna reject something, do it with gusteau, and for a concrete reason.
The vaccines aren't being rejected for the sake of those with adverse reactions, though for many that may be reason enough, but because the data doesn't make sense. Pouring over the numbers is telling us that in the case of the "safe and effective" vaccines, they are in fact neither safe, nor effective.
mRNA codon vaccine technology is experimental. Before now, it was extensively researched, and rejected for human trials not once, not blindly, but for very concrete reasons. The Inventor of the process himself is an advocate against receiving this medical product. So, safety issues abound.
The effectiveness is then in question. After all, according to the FDA and CDC, the immunized population is not immune, not less likely to spread COVID when they have it, or to not die if they catch it. But it may reduce severity if you'd end up in the hospital. So it reduces severity of symptoms, like Tylenol for a fever.
So the vaccine isn't an effective vaccine, or even a vaccine at all. It's a prophylactic treatment against the severity of COVID, and a risky one at that in the face of a good ol tube of ivermectin.
That's a logical position on why it's rejected. Concrete, potentially flawed, but not lazy.
Tldr: the vaccine is rejected because it claims to be safe and effective. The preliminary data strongly suggests otherwise, and people can read. It's not done blindly except by lazy people. Numbers and data sourced from CDC, vaers, and FDA.