No, I think you misunderstand what's happening here. As I understand it, "the majority decision" refers to the original ruling "by majority" against Ms Kimber. That majority decision was appealed by Ms Kimber, and the Fair Work Commission overturned that majority decision in common agreement, qualified by a joint document. There is no dissenting opinion recorded in this document.
And yet, Dan Andrews went ahead and announced Vaccine Mandates for essential workers.
FAIR WORK COMMISSION DECISION Jennifer Kimber v Sapphire Coast Community Aged Care Ltd
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2021fwcfb6015.htm
https://archive.is/VEiGo
Videos
YouTube Mirror: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTCp5ITdFO4
Source on FB: https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?ref=watch_permalink&v=607241924053438
No, I think you misunderstand what's happening here. As I understand it, "the majority decision" refers to the original ruling "by majority" against Ms Kimber. That majority decision was appealed by Ms Kimber, and the Fair Work Commission overturned that majority decision in common agreement, qualified by a joint document. There is no dissenting opinion recorded in this document.
Thank you for your correction, I'll be deleting my post in light of this.