You do not understand at all. Education has failed you, or you're slow, or you're lying on purpose.
Trigonometry proves that the sun is approximately 93,000,000 miles away. If the earth were flat, the shadows of the two sticks would be too similar to measure the difference in ancient times. The amount of the difference could only be explained by the earth being round and about 8,000 miles in diameter.
Eratosthenes didn't know how far away the sun was from Earth. Neither do you.
All of those calculations are based entirely upon assumptions. That's what I said in my initial reply. Unfortunately for you, that's a true statement.
At any rate, no, the results of his experiments only proved that there were two different shadows in two different locations. An entirely repeatable phenomenon that in no way proves curvature. Unless! You think your flooring is curved. I do not.
Trigonometry is not an assumption. It gives real results that surveyors have used for centuries. Aristarchus first calculated the distance to the sun and the moon over 2,000 years ago. Our more accurate modern measurement involved radar measurement of the distance to Venus and some trigonometry.
I guess you think "2+2=4" is merely an assumption.
The only thing you know is how to spell Eratosthenes.
I never said trigonometry was an assumption. Calm down.
I said the calculation around Earth's distance from the sun involved assumptions.
I'm not sure you're comprehending what I mean. The variables involved in the calculation were not taken from empirical evidence (aka, not scientific evidence).
Don't believe me? Great! Find out for yourself.
Without those assumptions, we cannot calculate anything. I think until a few minutes ago, you had no idea that assumptions were involved. If the assumptions are incorrect, the entire calculation is ruined.
You do not understand at all. Education has failed you, or you're slow, or you're lying on purpose.
Trigonometry proves that the sun is approximately 93,000,000 miles away. If the earth were flat, the shadows of the two sticks would be too similar to measure the difference in ancient times. The amount of the difference could only be explained by the earth being round and about 8,000 miles in diameter.
Eratosthenes didn't know how far away the sun was from Earth. Neither do you.
All of those calculations are based entirely upon assumptions. That's what I said in my initial reply. Unfortunately for you, that's a true statement.
At any rate, no, the results of his experiments only proved that there were two different shadows in two different locations. An entirely repeatable phenomenon that in no way proves curvature. Unless! You think your flooring is curved. I do not.
Trigonometry is not an assumption. It gives real results that surveyors have used for centuries. Aristarchus first calculated the distance to the sun and the moon over 2,000 years ago. Our more accurate modern measurement involved radar measurement of the distance to Venus and some trigonometry.
I guess you think "2+2=4" is merely an assumption.
The only thing you know is how to spell Eratosthenes.
Just give it up.
I never said trigonometry was an assumption. Calm down.
I said the calculation around Earth's distance from the sun involved assumptions.
I'm not sure you're comprehending what I mean. The variables involved in the calculation were not taken from empirical evidence (aka, not scientific evidence).
Don't believe me? Great! Find out for yourself.
Without those assumptions, we cannot calculate anything. I think until a few minutes ago, you had no idea that assumptions were involved. If the assumptions are incorrect, the entire calculation is ruined.
Simple measurements on the ground and trigonometry are all you need. No assumptions whatsoever.