I’ll allow the Smithsonian to explain the very basic relationship between a hung fixed point objects inertia and it’s behavior in relation to the rotating earth. This is pretty simple stuff that you can test for yourself.
I can see the ocean behind a ship that is six miles away from me.
This necessitates nearly 40 feet of drop, which should completely hide the ship and the coastline.
Yet... it's all visible. Impossible on a ball.
The Foucault pendulum, oh boy. Why would any pendulum be stationary on earth, if this pendulum gains momentum from earth's rotation? Why would this pendulum ever rotate in the opposite direction? Why wouldn't this pendulum be affected by all of earth's motion, rather than just it's axial rotation?
There's a reason you don't hear a lot of scientists worth listening to quoting this pendulum. It proves nothing. It's a show, for fools.
So you clearly didn’t read the article, the onus is on you idiots to disprove the accepted theories because you are ones claiming the conspiracy. If you can’t even be bothered to read a simple article then why should we listen to you?
I actually can’t believe I am arguing with someone who honestly thinks the earth is flat… I thought you people only existed as a meme but here we are. How high above sea level are you standing? Your 6 foot increase in height alone changes the angle of observation, allowing you to see more of the boat. Where does the boat go once it hits 12 miles, or 15 miles? How about you do some simple Deductive reasoning.
You aren't arguing, you're just throwing out insults. I'm challenging your programming.
I knew what pendulum you were talking about, as there's only one type that behaves this way (for Scientific reasons, of course). I'm sure since you're so deeply read on the subject, that you know many of these exist all over the world, and have failed to rotate, or rotated in the opposite direction of our spin countless times. Can you imagine actually starting this pendulum and not giving it a bias in a horizontal direction...? I can't believe that this convinces you, aren't you supposed to be awake?
You didn't answer the obvious question, which is that if this pendulum gained momentum from the earth's rotation, why would it ever need to be started at all?
So is it only proof when it works? And then evidence of nothing when it fails?
Why don't we talk about the fundamental fact that we can't measure the Earth's supposed curvature? We know exactly what it's claimed to be, but we can't ever seem to measure it.
Gravity is 100% why the pendulum stops and why there needs to be some sort of force applied to it to continue it moving in perpetuity because energy is lost by the pendulum after each swing. If you read the article you would see that 50+ foot pendulum can go on its own for 2 hours, and its path will move 0-15 degrees every 15 minutes depending on location. It had been proven, and there are videos, feel free to look them up.
As for measuring the curvature of the earth, how have you proved its 0?
Explain your process and present your data.
I’ll allow the Smithsonian to explain the very basic relationship between a hung fixed point objects inertia and it’s behavior in relation to the rotating earth. This is pretty simple stuff that you can test for yourself.
the earth rotates
I can see the ocean behind a ship that is six miles away from me.
This necessitates nearly 40 feet of drop, which should completely hide the ship and the coastline.
Yet... it's all visible. Impossible on a ball.
The Foucault pendulum, oh boy. Why would any pendulum be stationary on earth, if this pendulum gains momentum from earth's rotation? Why would this pendulum ever rotate in the opposite direction? Why wouldn't this pendulum be affected by all of earth's motion, rather than just it's axial rotation?
There's a reason you don't hear a lot of scientists worth listening to quoting this pendulum. It proves nothing. It's a show, for fools.
So you clearly didn’t read the article, the onus is on you idiots to disprove the accepted theories because you are ones claiming the conspiracy. If you can’t even be bothered to read a simple article then why should we listen to you?
I actually can’t believe I am arguing with someone who honestly thinks the earth is flat… I thought you people only existed as a meme but here we are. How high above sea level are you standing? Your 6 foot increase in height alone changes the angle of observation, allowing you to see more of the boat. Where does the boat go once it hits 12 miles, or 15 miles? How about you do some simple Deductive reasoning.
You aren't arguing, you're just throwing out insults. I'm challenging your programming.
I knew what pendulum you were talking about, as there's only one type that behaves this way (for Scientific reasons, of course). I'm sure since you're so deeply read on the subject, that you know many of these exist all over the world, and have failed to rotate, or rotated in the opposite direction of our spin countless times. Can you imagine actually starting this pendulum and not giving it a bias in a horizontal direction...? I can't believe that this convinces you, aren't you supposed to be awake?
You didn't answer the obvious question, which is that if this pendulum gained momentum from the earth's rotation, why would it ever need to be started at all?
So is it only proof when it works? And then evidence of nothing when it fails?
Why don't we talk about the fundamental fact that we can't measure the Earth's supposed curvature? We know exactly what it's claimed to be, but we can't ever seem to measure it.
Is that because of gravity, too?
Gravity is 100% why the pendulum stops and why there needs to be some sort of force applied to it to continue it moving in perpetuity because energy is lost by the pendulum after each swing. If you read the article you would see that 50+ foot pendulum can go on its own for 2 hours, and its path will move 0-15 degrees every 15 minutes depending on location. It had been proven, and there are videos, feel free to look them up.
As for measuring the curvature of the earth, how have you proved its 0?