So, the thing with your Circle in a magazine is silly. Yes, if you had me a picture and ask me to measure the exact size of the circle I wouldn't be able to do it, because I'd need to go to the actual canvas itself. But the thing is that you CAN go to the canvas and measure it. Someone drew it, someone's been there, so someone knows.
Now, with the sun, maybe we don't know exactly how big it is, BUT the fact is it HAS to have a diameter. It HAS to have a size. And, logically, it SHOULD remain consistent, at least relatively.
To your earlier point that I did skip - the sun does get larger and smaller. Heliocentrists say that's all due to refraction.
Okay, so what's the explanation in the flat earth model? I don't give a shit about the round earth model because that's not what we're talking about.
As far as the flight, planes wouldn't work if the earth was a rotating ball - but I know nothing of that flight. Yes, there are plenty of irrational excuses as to why it's possible that planes could fly, but they don't follow the laws of physics. I'll believe in God on faith, I won't believe in science on faith.
So, in the flat earth model, the distance between South America and Australia is about as far of a distance as you can get. This would, theoretically, be by far the longest flight you could take. However, it only takes about 15 hours. How is it possible for a flight from the two farthest points to be that short?
So, the thing with your Circle in a magazine is silly. Yes, if you had me a picture and ask me to measure the exact size of the circle I wouldn't be able to do it, because I'd need to go to the actual canvas itself. But the thing is that you CAN go to the canvas and measure it. Someone drew it, someone's been there, so someone knows.
Now, with the sun, maybe we don't know exactly how big it is, BUT the fact is it HAS to have a diameter. It HAS to have a size. And, logically, it SHOULD remain consistent, at least relatively.
You're breaking through. Above is mostly correct. There's no 'maybe' involved, unless you know someone who travelled to the sun and back.
Okay, so what's the explanation in the flat earth model? I don't give a shit about the round earth model because that's not what we're talking about.
It gets larger and smaller because it is moving from overhead (near you) to far away. We discussed this before. This is also what sets the sun, you can experiment and prove this yourself.
So, in the flat earth model, the distance between South America and Australia is about as far of a distance as you can get. This would, theoretically, be by far the longest flight you could take. However, it only takes about 15 hours. How is it possible for a flight from the two farthest points to be that short?
The flight, honestly I have no idea. I've never looked into that specific flight. A flight doesn't 'debunk' a flat earth. A curve would.
I don't give a shit about the round earth model because that's not what we're talking about.
Well, you should. You believe in it, and the only reason you believe in it is because you were told to believe in it. The model is so monumentally stupid, it is a blessing to be on the other side of it.
Look into gravity. Without gravity, heliocentrism doesn't exist. Try and define gravity as something separate from Buoyancy and Density.
Prove the curvature. Use an earth-curve calculator, find an object that you're able to see from too far away. You'll need a camera with good zoom, or a telescope.
Explain how gas exists next to a vacuum, ignoring the second law of thermodynamics.
When researching this above, look into how man-made objects react to vacuums that we're capable of reproducing on earth. Then consider the supposed vacuum of space is exponentially stronger than this. Then consider satellites.
So, the thing with your Circle in a magazine is silly. Yes, if you had me a picture and ask me to measure the exact size of the circle I wouldn't be able to do it, because I'd need to go to the actual canvas itself. But the thing is that you CAN go to the canvas and measure it. Someone drew it, someone's been there, so someone knows.
Now, with the sun, maybe we don't know exactly how big it is, BUT the fact is it HAS to have a diameter. It HAS to have a size. And, logically, it SHOULD remain consistent, at least relatively.
Okay, so what's the explanation in the flat earth model? I don't give a shit about the round earth model because that's not what we're talking about.
So, in the flat earth model, the distance between South America and Australia is about as far of a distance as you can get. This would, theoretically, be by far the longest flight you could take. However, it only takes about 15 hours. How is it possible for a flight from the two farthest points to be that short?
You're breaking through. Above is mostly correct. There's no 'maybe' involved, unless you know someone who travelled to the sun and back.
It gets larger and smaller because it is moving from overhead (near you) to far away. We discussed this before. This is also what sets the sun, you can experiment and prove this yourself.
The flight, honestly I have no idea. I've never looked into that specific flight. A flight doesn't 'debunk' a flat earth. A curve would.
Well, you should. You believe in it, and the only reason you believe in it is because you were told to believe in it. The model is so monumentally stupid, it is a blessing to be on the other side of it.
Look into gravity. Without gravity, heliocentrism doesn't exist. Try and define gravity as something separate from Buoyancy and Density.
Prove the curvature. Use an earth-curve calculator, find an object that you're able to see from too far away. You'll need a camera with good zoom, or a telescope.
Explain how gas exists next to a vacuum, ignoring the second law of thermodynamics.
When researching this above, look into how man-made objects react to vacuums that we're capable of reproducing on earth. Then consider the supposed vacuum of space is exponentially stronger than this. Then consider satellites.
There is so much, these are entertaining starts.