I will never understand why people have babies in hospitals outside of emergent situations I had 3 of my 4 children at a midwife my second child I had to have in hospital because my water broke without contractions and it was getting to a point where I had to be induced. It was one of the worst experiences I have ever had.
The answer is because that's what they've been taught to do by society. MSM mocks anything like that by making home births something only hippie types do. Just getting the bill for the first one should be enough to get folks to consider other options lol.
Maybe, but I don't know because when I had my first daughter I was a democrat and pretty leftist. Yet some reason had her at a midwife, I honestly don't even remember how I heard about her, might have been from the woman who did my pregnancy test. (It's been over 10 years since my first was born)
Same thing happened with my friend’s firstborn. Did a home birth, then the bleeding started and couldn’t be stopped. Thankfully the rescue squad was fast and the hospital close by. I had to have c-sections for both of mine. If that hadn’t been an option, my first son, and possibly I, would’ve died.
My wife is an L&D nurse. She says 90 percent of births go just fine, and they could have been a home delivery, or midwife, or doula, but the problem is that other 10 percent, and seconds make a difference much less minutes.
I agree, my daughter had both of her boys at home with a midwife, the best experiences ever. The pain is much more tolerable when you are in a comfortable environment, with no bright lights and unnecessary drugs, bath with fresh herbs immediately afterward. I was so impressed with the quality of care available when doing this.
I will never understand why people have babies in hospitals outside of emergent situations I had 3 of my 4 children at a midwife my second child I had to have in hospital because my water broke without contractions and it was getting to a point where I had to be induced. It was one of the worst experiences I have ever had.
The answer is because that's what they've been taught to do by society. MSM mocks anything like that by making home births something only hippie types do. Just getting the bill for the first one should be enough to get folks to consider other options lol.
Maybe, but I don't know because when I had my first daughter I was a democrat and pretty leftist. Yet some reason had her at a midwife, I honestly don't even remember how I heard about her, might have been from the woman who did my pregnancy test. (It's been over 10 years since my first was born)
Because when things go wrong during birth it happens too fast to get to a hospital. Better to be there already. That's why I still have my son.
Same thing happened with my friend’s firstborn. Did a home birth, then the bleeding started and couldn’t be stopped. Thankfully the rescue squad was fast and the hospital close by. I had to have c-sections for both of mine. If that hadn’t been an option, my first son, and possibly I, would’ve died.
First child had a problem that did need the knowledge of medical professionals. All babies and all births are not without problems.
My wife is an L&D nurse. She says 90 percent of births go just fine, and they could have been a home delivery, or midwife, or doula, but the problem is that other 10 percent, and seconds make a difference much less minutes.
Me, too!
I agree, my daughter had both of her boys at home with a midwife, the best experiences ever. The pain is much more tolerable when you are in a comfortable environment, with no bright lights and unnecessary drugs, bath with fresh herbs immediately afterward. I was so impressed with the quality of care available when doing this.