Would you tolerate a bomb in your body, waiting to detonate if you deviated from the needs of society?
(media.communities.win)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (117)
sorted by:
Are policemen necessary? Why or why not?
I'm not arguing the merits or not of any position. I'm explaining to you that this is an actual Marxist argument. Marxists post this. They use it to justify dehumanizing those they feel aren't living for the state, and dreaming of executing them - afterall the body does it so it's perfectly right for me to as well. This protein is a savior for the body, and so I shall be a savior of society executing those I deem cancerous.
All the rest of you seem to be so ashamed that you found yourself tricked by marxist theory that you're trying to pretend it actually hasn't anything to do with marxism.
You ever seen the movie taxi driver? This is a valid discussion, quit shitting all over it.
The discussion is irrelevant, you're not even reading what I wrote.
But if I were to take a stance on that discussion, I would not take the marxist position that those I view as cancerous can be morally executed 'for the greater good'
But if you want to be one of those "Communism would have worked if only I had been the one deciding who to execute" you go ahead and be wrong.