Trump has more than enough to take the presidency by force now. They cheated, they lost, aNd they get punished with the death penalty for colluding with a foreign government t to overthrow the people who are rhe legit U.S. government.
Even if he uses the military it won't be violent.
The cops can be put on notice any who played along get investigated and depending on how much they abandoned their oath they may get punished for treason. The chief of police in D. C. And that lying murderer cop are good examples.
Images were delivered compressed and some janky shit happened. That is NOT the same thing as being modified. Holy fuck these are some leftist levels of headline hyperbole
Do they need to go back and get the source files? Obviously.
Does this raise huge question as to why in the fuck this was part of their workflow? Hell yes.
But the title makes it seem like officials were opening the images in ms paint and changing shit.
My issue is with the title and the word "MODIFIED" please don't fucking straw man it into more than that. FFS some of you are completely incapable of self reflection or the least amount of legitimate criticism.
How can you know you're right about the big things when you can't even admit to being wrong about the tiniest of things?
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. To achieve that outcome of a white triangle with a black stroke, covering up text underneath would REQUIRE modification. There is zero way that “compression” process would result in that outcome. It just wouldn’t happen. You sitting here judging others while you’re the ignorant one. I’ve worked in design, print, and image processing for 20 years. Don’t fucking talk down like you’re the expert.
If unrecognizeable entries from compressed image triggers a filter, that's a compression issue. They didn't "modify" the image. They ran shitty compressed images through their workflow. As I originally said, this brings into question the WORKFLOW, and it means they need to aquire the source files, but titling this as "MODIFIED" is insane hyperbole.
I spent 7 years in print before doing what I do now. Don't try to appeal to authority on me buddy.
This isn’t appeal to authority. This is just you not knowing shit about what you’re talking about. This is pure modification, plain and simple. These were not unaltered (original) print files.
Trump has more than enough to take the presidency by force now. They cheated, they lost, aNd they get punished with the death penalty for colluding with a foreign government t to overthrow the people who are rhe legit U.S. government.
Even if he uses the military it won't be violent.
The cops can be put on notice any who played along get investigated and depending on how much they abandoned their oath they may get punished for treason. The chief of police in D. C. And that lying murderer cop are good examples.
I loved his questioning!! He’s so much smarter than the peons in Maricopa County. The election was stolen.
Archived Link:
https://archive.ph/3BaEE
Thanks CoolAsACucumber! 👈🏻
Anytime! DoD appeared to have blocked a Gateway Pundit article a day or 2 ago, you can never be too careful.
Archive websites at:
https://www.archive.ph
https://www.archive.is
https://www.archive.today
https://www.archive.md
Also if you use firefox, check out this Archive extension I use:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/archive-page/
Makes archiving articles just a click of a button.
There are others as well I haven't used like this one:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/the-archiver/
Thanks CoolAsACucumber! I typically use Dissenter Browser but I will check the archive extension out. Thanks for sharing with everyone!
Images were delivered compressed and some janky shit happened. That is NOT the same thing as being modified. Holy fuck these are some leftist levels of headline hyperbole
Do they need to go back and get the source files? Obviously.
Does this raise huge question as to why in the fuck this was part of their workflow? Hell yes.
But the title makes it seem like officials were opening the images in ms paint and changing shit.
Sure, everyone compresses files down to just two pixels, one black, one white. Gotta save room on those hard drives after all.
I'm not defending the compression, and pushing back on describing that compression as "modifying". Words matter.
That’s the answer you have for the 12 questions Dr. Shiva asked? Some janky shit happened? I will probably need something a little stronger than that.
My issue is with the title and the word "MODIFIED" please don't fucking straw man it into more than that. FFS some of you are completely incapable of self reflection or the least amount of legitimate criticism.
How can you know you're right about the big things when you can't even admit to being wrong about the tiniest of things?
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. To achieve that outcome of a white triangle with a black stroke, covering up text underneath would REQUIRE modification. There is zero way that “compression” process would result in that outcome. It just wouldn’t happen. You sitting here judging others while you’re the ignorant one. I’ve worked in design, print, and image processing for 20 years. Don’t fucking talk down like you’re the expert.
If unrecognizeable entries from compressed image triggers a filter, that's a compression issue. They didn't "modify" the image. They ran shitty compressed images through their workflow. As I originally said, this brings into question the WORKFLOW, and it means they need to aquire the source files, but titling this as "MODIFIED" is insane hyperbole.
I spent 7 years in print before doing what I do now. Don't try to appeal to authority on me buddy.
This isn’t appeal to authority. This is just you not knowing shit about what you’re talking about. This is pure modification, plain and simple. These were not unaltered (original) print files.
Fucking lul
Lol don’t be mad 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡