FFP2 efficiency "95%"
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zfvWgmk5/pravda/
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zNFbmRVJ/australian-health-minister-that-/
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zNAv5p8F/harvard-business-has-a-big-cov-p/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jd4tST1t/in-israel-95-of-the-severe-patie/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJLGeu3x/moorish-american-militia-group-h/c/
isn't that linked to:
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zMeC75Aj/microsoft-office-95--hall-of-tor/c/
or:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_interval
Is that number 95% their comms equivalent for word "confidence" or something more?
Asking for feedback and verification.
I think standards must be dropping. The Climate Change cabal always preferred 97%.
No. It was/is different message. Those numbers are messages and have a meaning.
hmm you're on to something, fren
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/05/30/all-decodes-categorized/
note the Trump references