Hmmm. I see now. Thanks for the clarification. I may have misread your intent (re: the focus on corruption vs personalities).
However, I meant to convey that I am skeptical that it is huge, whether one takes the more superficial view that it is these individuals that are the problem, or the more logical and frankly more based view that the system that uses them is the problem. Either way, I'm skeptical that this is "huge".
Or let me rephrase that. I am skeptical that it is a positive or good development in and of itself.
Moreover, I was perhaps less than articulate in what I wrote. In hindsight, when I wrote personalities, I actually meant individuals. Not a "personality" problem, obviously. Yes, a corruption problem. But I meant that removal of this or that individual is not necessarily significant in a positive way, but could just as easily indicate the removal of an individual whose use has been expended.
But about "corruption": The cairns article reports:
In a press conference on Tuesday Palmer dropped a bomb on the NSW Liberals and the corrupt role of a political lobbyist being paid tens of millions of dollars by Pfizer and Astra Zeneca. The same lobbyist, says Palmer, controls the Liberal Party in Sydney and is using the threat of the Independent Commission Against Corruption’s (ICAC) inquiries into Gladys Berejiklian to pull her strings and push the vaccines.
using the threat of the Independent Commission Against Corruption’s (ICAC) inquiries into Gladys Berejiklian to pull her strings
if the threat of the ICAC investigation could be used to pull her strings, it equally means that it could be used to remove her when her usefulness has expired.
It would be possible that Palmer's dropping this bomb suddenly made Gladys a less than useful instrument (her cover is blown) and so it would make 100% sense for the puppet controllers to remove her and replace with a back up, or even with something ready to step in once the Gladys phase of the operation was over.
Personally, I think that what they hold over these people is far, far worse than a mere corruption investigations. Threat of death, deep corruption, sexual manipulation, etc.
For me there is no doubt at all that they are deep, deep, deep in corruption, and always have been, and that this is the key reason why they do the masters' bidding. They are puppets, fully and completely.
I've seen posts on here, none recently, talking about the elites blackmailing politicians and celebrities, purposely luring them into things like child trafficking in order to blackmail them.
I was just trying to say I find the Pfizer, J&J bribery or blackmail or whatever it is to be unlikely to only have happened in New South Wales.
I was just trying to say I find the Pfizer, J&J bribery or blackmail or whatever it is to be unlikely to only have happened in New South Wales
Oh, there is no doubt in my mind about that. have you looked at how powerful the pharmaceutical cos are? How much money they control, and what they control?
Well, consider this. How much of Obamacare was a gift to pharmas, insurance companies and large medical conglomerates? How many smaller hospitals in the US as well as even local doctors' offices been swallowed up into these conglomerates since Obamacare? How much has the cost of your medicines gone up since Jan. 20? If you're not in the US, those who are will know what I'm talking about.
Hmmm. I see now. Thanks for the clarification. I may have misread your intent (re: the focus on corruption vs personalities).
However, I meant to convey that I am skeptical that it is huge, whether one takes the more superficial view that it is these individuals that are the problem, or the more logical and frankly more based view that the system that uses them is the problem. Either way, I'm skeptical that this is "huge".
Or let me rephrase that. I am skeptical that it is a positive or good development in and of itself.
Moreover, I was perhaps less than articulate in what I wrote. In hindsight, when I wrote personalities, I actually meant individuals. Not a "personality" problem, obviously. Yes, a corruption problem. But I meant that removal of this or that individual is not necessarily significant in a positive way, but could just as easily indicate the removal of an individual whose use has been expended.
But about "corruption": The cairns article reports:
if the threat of the ICAC investigation could be used to pull her strings, it equally means that it could be used to remove her when her usefulness has expired.
It would be possible that Palmer's dropping this bomb suddenly made Gladys a less than useful instrument (her cover is blown) and so it would make 100% sense for the puppet controllers to remove her and replace with a back up, or even with something ready to step in once the Gladys phase of the operation was over.
Personally, I think that what they hold over these people is far, far worse than a mere corruption investigations. Threat of death, deep corruption, sexual manipulation, etc.
For me there is no doubt at all that they are deep, deep, deep in corruption, and always have been, and that this is the key reason why they do the masters' bidding. They are puppets, fully and completely.
I've seen posts on here, none recently, talking about the elites blackmailing politicians and celebrities, purposely luring them into things like child trafficking in order to blackmail them.
I was just trying to say I find the Pfizer, J&J bribery or blackmail or whatever it is to be unlikely to only have happened in New South Wales.
Oh, there is no doubt in my mind about that. have you looked at how powerful the pharmaceutical cos are? How much money they control, and what they control?
Well, consider this. How much of Obamacare was a gift to pharmas, insurance companies and large medical conglomerates? How many smaller hospitals in the US as well as even local doctors' offices been swallowed up into these conglomerates since Obamacare? How much has the cost of your medicines gone up since Jan. 20? If you're not in the US, those who are will know what I'm talking about.