Let's assume for arguments sake that the jabs, after this flu season, will smash through a significant number of people. People begin dropping and the flu season turns into a terrible, terrible epidemic.
Up until this point he's advertised it and the only differentiation he's made from the narrative is that they should not be mandated.
What's the rationale at that point? That white hats replaced many of the poisons and it could have been worse? That this had to happen as part of the plan?
What can he say once the jab (assuming it does what we think it does), begins doing what it was designed to do? He's the one who promoted it, funded it and essentially ran half a campaign on it.
That they solely relied on the vaccine and didn't give people other options?
I'm trying to wrap my head around how he can call out the DS for it.
I totally agree with you. I watched his interview on the 10/1 And We Know. He danced around the question from the interviewer (Harris) and did not answer. Why are the Dems mandating this vax when they were so against it prior to November 3? I can’t believe an untested mRNA vaccine can be part of “the plan” and now we have the mandate in California to vax all school children from age 5 in both public and private schools? Something is just not right! Some may not like this, but has DJT been part of the DS/Great Reset plan all along?
The longer DJT goes without speaking out more against the shots, the more I think the same thing. He has no problem sending out statements about everything else, but is silent on the mandate tyranny. Also, Powell and Flynn have publicly questioned why DJT has remained silent on the matter. The silence is deafening.
Who are they all afraid of? Big Pharma. The World Economic Forum is the big Corporations. They can kill anyone.
Bingo.