Lucifer the light bearer was a carrier of the light but not the originator of the light, until his Fall. Now he is a mere shadow of his pre-Fall self, and now all he bears is shadow, the absence of light. Thus what the Freemasons worship now is shadow, which is the absence of light, of good and of God: that is to say, they now worship evil.
There is no confusion in StormzAComing's statement to "be the light", that is to say partake in the Light of God, while condemning the Satanic adversary, Lucifer the light bearer, because they are not the same thing. Praise the fig fruit (light of God), but if the fig tree bears no fruit (Lucifer, former bearer of light, now bearer of shadow), then the Lord will strike it down.
You would do well to realise that Lucifer's name is now an ironic mockery of his former role.
It sure looks like you missed the point.
Lucifer the light bearer was a carrier of the light but not the originator of the light, until his Fall. Now he is a mere shadow of his pre-Fall self, and now all he bears is shadow, the absence of light. Thus what the Freemasons worship now is shadow, which is the absence of light, of good and of God: that is to say, they now worship evil.
There is no confusion in StormzAComing's statement to "be the light", that is to say partake in the Light of God, while condemning the Satanic adversary, Lucifer the light bearer, because they are not the same thing. Praise the fig fruit (light of God), but if the fig tree bears no fruit (Lucifer, former bearer of light, now bearer of shadow), then the Lord will strike it down.
You would do well to realise that Lucifer's name is now an ironic mockery of his former role.