Title. ☝️
I think this whole thing is set up to get people talking about federal regulation of speech, and making censorship the law.
Because, waaaaaah, Facebook isn't doing enough censoring 😭. Plz halp, big daddy government.
-
They don't want us speaking the truth.
-
They're trying to destroy the constitution.
-
Facebook can't be held liable for censorship.
Listen for yourself, it's nauseating. Here's the 60 minutes interview:
Seems to me this “Facebook whistleblower” was there to try to do damage control/distraction on Project Veritas’s fourth Covid expose. This way if an anon brings it up to a normie, the normie thinks they’re talking about the 60 Minutes segment. The two are designed to get conflated. Someone even posted here referring to the scientists that O’Keefe caught revealing the truth about Pfizer as “whistleblowers”. The conflation worked for them.
I also think this is why they called it “muh Delta variant”. It was a way to throw sand all over the Q deltas. They did the same thing when the Clinton Foundation scandal came out by making something up about the Trump Foundation. There are a few others like this where they push a FAKE NEWS story just to push a keyword to the top of the Google search results.
Like masks. I think part of the mask agenda was to dump so much noise on the Flynn unmasking scandal. Democrats could then go, “Unmasking? No, you’re confused. It’s the Republicans who want people to take off their masks. We are all about wearing masks. Mask up. Wear your mask! Don’t unmask if you are less than six feet away. You heard it here: Democrats think it is very very dangerous to unmask and never would. Mask mask mask!”