Unfortunately, they have Section 230 protection from lawsuits because they are considered a platform, but are clearly acting as publishers with their censorship and "fact-checking" teams (paid for in large part by Big Pharma to label anything that exposes them as false)
Basically, the dems want to revise Section 230 for more censorship and conservatives for less.
Unfortunately, they have Section 230 protection from lawsuits because they are considered a platform, but are clearly acting as publishers with their censorship and "fact-checking" teams (paid for in large part by Big Pharma to label anything that exposes them as false)
Basically, the dems want to revise Section 230 for more censorship and conservatives for less.
Yes. But they used hide the stuff that makes them a publisher.. now they just talk openly about it and still they have 230 protections.
I agree, there is no question at this point, but the dems don't like it either, but want to revise it as a tool for more censorship.
Yup, they're teeing up Kamala & Smolett's newly revised anti-lynching bill.