The bad guys wouldn't know what the good guys have.
The bad guys can work on the assumption that the white hats "have it all" but why make it easy for them?
Just get rid of everything and then ride on any single missing puzzle piece saying:
AHA! You see! You might have 99% of the story on our crimes, but since your investigation doesn't have an answer for the 1%, then your investigation is entirely flawed!
The burden of proof is always in our court. That's how they always "win" every argument.
Just as with the "vaccine," they've convinced us that the burden of proof is to show that "vaccines" are dangerous.
In a sane world, it would be on THEM to prove the "vaccines" are safe.
The bad guys wouldn't know what the good guys have.
The bad guys can work on the assumption that the white hats "have it all" but why make it easy for them?
Just get rid of everything and then ride on any single missing puzzle piece saying:
The burden of proof is always in our court. That's how they always "win" every argument.
Just as with the "vaccine," they've convinced us that the burden of proof is to show that "vaccines" are dangerous.
In a sane world, it would be on THEM to prove the "vaccines" are safe.